The Cause of the Charge of BalaclavaMorley, Thomas
History
The Cause of the Charge of Balaclava
Morley, Thomas
Balaklava, Battle of, Balaklava, Ukraine, 1854; Crimean War, 1853-1856; Morley, Thomas, 1831 or 1832-1906
When I received it I placed it in the hands of Brigadier-General
Airey, the Quartermaster-General, and requested him to suggest to his
lordship to withdraw the communication, considering that it would not
lead to his advantage in the slightest degree; but Lord Lucan having
declined to take the step recommended, I have but one course to
pursue—that of laying the letter before Your Grace and submitting to
you such observations upon it as I am bound, in justice to myself, to
put you in possession of.
Lieutenant General the Earl of Lucan complains that in my dispatch to
Your Grace of the 28th of October, I stated that, “from some
misconception of the instruction to advance, the Lieutenant General
considered that he was bound to attack at all hazards.” His Lordship
conceives this statement to be a grave charge and an imputation
reflecting seriously on his professional character, and he deems it
incumbent upon him to state those facts which he cannot doubt must
clear him from what he respectfully submits as altogether unmerited.
I have referred to my dispatch and far from being willing to recall
one word of it, I am prepared to declare, that not only did the
Lieutenant General misconceive the written instruction that was sent
him, but that there was nothing in that instruction which called upon
him to attack at all hazards, or to undertake the operation which led
to such a brilliant display of gallantry on the part of the Light
Brigade, and unhappily, at the same time occasioned such lamentable
casualties in every regiment composing it.
In his lordship’s letter he is wholly silent with respect to a
previous order which had been sent him. He merely says that the
cavalry was formed to support an intended movement of the infantry.
This previous order was in the following words:—“The cavalry to
advance and take advantage of any opportunity to recover the heights.
They will be supported by infantry which has been ordered to advance
on two fronts.”
This order did not seem to me to have been attended to, and therefore
it was that the instruction by Captain Nolan was forwarded to him.
Lord Lucan must have read the first order with very little attention
for he now states that the cavalry was formed to support the
infantry, whereas he was told by Brigadier General Airey, “that the
cavalry was to advance and take advantage of any opportunity to
recover the heights, and that they would be supported by infantry.”
Not that they were to support the infantry; and so little had he
sought to do as he had been directed, that he had no men in advance
of his main body, made no attempt to regain the heights, and was so
little informed of the position of the enemy, that he ask Captain
Nolan, “where and what he was to attack, as neither enemy nor guns
were in sight?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account