The Cause of the Charge of BalaclavaMorley, Thomas
History
The Cause of the Charge of Balaclava
Morley, Thomas
Balaklava, Battle of, Balaklava, Ukraine, 1854; Crimean War, 1853-1856; Morley, Thomas, 1831 or 1832-1906
This, Your Grace will observe, is the Lieutenant General’s own
admission. The result of his inattention to the first order was,
that it never occurred to him that the second was connected with, and
a repetition of the first. He viewed it only as a positive order to
attack at all hazards (the word “attack” be it observed was not made
use of in General Airy’s note). An unseen enemy, whose position,
numbers and composition he was wholly unacquainted with, and whom, in
consequence of a previous order, he had taken no steps whatever to
watch.
I undoubtedly had no intention that he should make such an
attack—there was nothing in the instructions to require it; and
therefore I conceive I was fully justified in stating to Your Grace
what was the exact truth, that the charge arose from the
misconception of the order for the advance which Lord Lucan
considered obliged him to attack at all hazards.
I wish I could say with his lordship that, having decided against his
conviction to make the movement, he did all he could to render it as
little perilous as possible. This, indeed, is far from being the
case in my judgment. He was told that the Horse Artillery might
accompany the cavalry. He did not bring it up. He was informed that
the French cavalry was on the left. He did not invite their
co-operation. He had the whole of the heavy cavalry at his disposal.
He mentions having brought up only two regiments in support, and he
omits all other precautions, either from want of due consideration,
or from the supposition that the unseen enemy was not in such great
force as he apprehended, notwithstanding that he was warned of it by
Lord Cardigan, after the latter had received the order to attack. I
am much concerned, My Lord Duke, to have to submit these observations
to Your Grace. I entertain no wish to disparage the Earl of Lucan in
your opinion, or to cast a slur upon professional reputation; but
having been accused by his lordship of having stated of him what was
unmentioned in my dispatch, I have felt obliged to enter into the
subject, and trouble Your Grace at more length than I could have
wished, in vindication of a report of Your Grace in which I had
strictly confined myself to that which I knew to be true and had
indulged in no observations whatever, or in any expression which
could be viewed either as harsh or in any way grating to the feelings
of his lordship.
I have etc.
(Signed) RAGLAN.
* * * * *
[Picture: The Gun that Lieutenant Jarvis and myself captured]
SWORN STATEMENT FOR VICTORIA
CROSS IN SUPREME COURT,
UNITED STATES.
* * * * *
To Lord Wolseley, Commander-in-Chief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account