The Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels: Being the Sequel to The Traditional Text of the Holy GospelsBurgon, John William
Religion
The Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels: Being the Sequel to The Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels
Burgon, John William
Bible. Gospels -- Criticism, Textual
[32] I look for an approving word from learned Dr. Field, who wrote in
1875--'The real obstacle to our acquiescing in the reading of the T.R.
is, that if the words [Greek: oude echo] had once formed a part of the
original text, there is no possibility of accounting for the subsequent
omission of them.' The same remark, but considerably toned down, is
found in his delightful Otium Norvicense, P. iii, p. 84.
[33] B and C read--[Greek: all' oudenos logou poioumai ten psychen
emauto]: which is exactly what Lucifer Calarit. represents,--'_sed pro
nihilo aestimo animam meam caram esse mihi_' (Galland. vi. 241).
[34] [Symbol: Aleph] reads--[Greek: all' oudenos logon poioumai ten
psychen timian emauto hos teleioso ton dromon mou].
[35] '_Sed nihil horum_ ([Greek: touton] is found in many Greek Codd.)
_vereor, nee facio animam meam pretiosiorem quam me_.' So, the _Cod.
Amiat._ It is evident then that when Ambrose (ii. 1040) writes '_nec
facio animam meam cariorem mihi_,' he is quoting the latter of these two
clauses. Augustine (iii^{1}. 516), when he cites the place thus, '_Non
enim facto animam meam preliosiorem quam me_'; and elsewhere (iv. 268)
'_pretiosam mihi_'; also Origen (_interp._ iv. 628 c), '_sed ego non
facto cariorem animam meam mihi_'; and even the Coptic, '_sed anima mea,
dico, non est pretiosa mihi in aliquo verbo_':--these evidently
summarize the place, by making a sentence out of what survives of the
second clause. The Latin of D exhibits '_Sed nihil horum cura est mihi:
neque habeo ipsam animam caram mihi_.'
[36] Dr. Field says that it may be thus Graecized--[Greek: all' oudena
logon poioumai, oude lelogistai moi psyche ti timion].
[37] ii. 296 e,--exactly as the T.R.
[38] Exactly as the T.R., except that he writes [Greek: ten psychen]
without [Greek: mou] (ix. 332). So again, further on (334 b), [Greek:
ouk echo timian ten emautou psychen]. This latter place is quoted in
Cramer's Cat. 334.
[39] _Ap._ Mai ii. 336 [Greek: edei kai tes zoes kataphronein hyper tou
teleiosai ton dromon, oude ten psychen ephe poieiosai timian heauto.]
[40] [Greek: logon echo, oude poioumai ten psychen timian emauto, oste
k.t.l.] (_ap._ Galland. x. 222).
[41] [Greek: all' oudenos logon poioumai ton deinon, oude echo ten
psychen timian emauto]. Epist. ad Tars. c. 1 (Dressel, p. 255).
[42] The whole of Dr. Field's learned annotation deserves to be
carefully read and pondered. I speak of it especially in the shape in
which it originally appeared, viz. in 1875.
[43] Ibid. p. 2 and 3.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account