The celestial worlds discover'd : $b or, conjectures concerning the inhabitants, plants and productions of the worlds in the planetsHuygens, Christiaan
Science
The celestial worlds discover'd : $b or, conjectures concerning the inhabitants, plants and productions of the worlds in the planets
Huygens, Christiaan
Cosmology -- Early works to 1800; Life on other planets -- Early works to 1800; Plurality of worlds -- Early works to 1800
flying about, as the Clouds are of them gathered into ſmall Drops. And
another Proof of it is, the neceſſity of breathing for the preſervation
of Life, a Thing that ſeems to be as univerſal a Dictate of Nature, as
feeding upon the Fruits of the Earth.
[Touch.]
As for Feeling, it ſeems to be given upon neceſſity to all Creatures
that are cover’d with a fine and ſenſible Skin, as a Caution againſt
coming too near thoſe Things that may injure or incommode them: and
without it they would be liable to continual Wounds, Blows and Bruiſes.
Nature ſeems to have been ſo ſenſible of this, that ſhe has not left
the leaſt place free from ſuch a Perception. Therefore it’s probable
that the Inhabitants of thoſe Worlds are not without ſo neceſſary a
Defence, and ſo fit a Preſervative againſt Dangers and Miſhaps.
[Smell and Taſte.]
And who is there that doth not ſee the inevitable neceſſity for all
Creatures that live by feeding to have both Taſte and Smell, that they
may diſtinguiſh thoſe Things that are good and nouriſhing, from thoſe
that are miſchievous and harmful? If therefore we allow the Planetary
Creatures to feed upon Herbs, Seeds, or Fleſh, we muſt allow them Taſte
and Smell, that they may chuſe or refuſe any Thing according as they
find it likely to be advantageous or noxious to them.
I know that it hath been a Queſtion with many, whether there might not
have been more Senſes than theſe five. [Their Senſes not very different
from ours.] If we ſhould allow this, it might nevertheleſs be
reaſonably doubted, whether the Senſes of the Planetary Inhabitants are
much different from ours. I muſt confeſs, I cannot deny but there might
poſſibly have been more Senſes; but when I conſider the Uſes of thoſe
we have, I cannot think but they would have been ſuperfluous. The Eye
was made to diſcern near and remote Objects, the Ear to give us notice
of what our Eyes could not, either in the Dark or behind our Back: Then
what neither the Eye nor the Ear could, the Noſe was made (which in
Dogs is wonderfully nice) to warn us of. And if any thing eſcapes the
notice of the other four Senſes, we have Feeling to inform us of the
too near Approaches of it before it can do us any miſchief. Thus has
Nature ſo plentifully, ſo perfectly provided for the neceſſary
preſervation of her Creatures here, that I think ſhe can give nothing
more to thoſe there, but what will be needleſs and ſuperfluous. Yet the
Senſes were not wholly deſigned for uſe: but Men from all, and all
other Animals from ſome of them, reap Pleaſure as well as Profit, as
from the Taſte in delicious Meats; from the Smell in Flowers and
Perfumes; from the Sight in the Contemplation of beauteous Shapes and
Colours; from the Hearing in the Sweetneſs and Harmony of Sounds; from
the Feeling in Copulation, unleſs you pleaſe to count that for a
particular Senſe by it ſelf. [They have Pleaſure ariſing from the
Senſes.] Since it is thus, I think ’tis but reaſonable to allow the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account