The Celtic Magazine, Vol. I, No. VI, April 1876: A Monthly Periodical Devoted to the Literature, History, Antiquities, Folk Lore, Traditions, and the Social and Material Interests of the Celt at Home and AbroadVarious
History
The Celtic Magazine, Vol. I, No. VI, April 1876: A Monthly Periodical Devoted to the Literature, History, Antiquities, Folk Lore, Traditions, and the Social and Material Interests of the Celt at Home and Abroad
No one approaching the subject with an unprejudiced mind, after giving
the smallest consideration to the subject, can maintain that a system
which wholly ignores the only language known to the child when he enters
school for the first time, can be either a sensible, a reasonable, or a
successful one. It is doubtful if ever such a system was adopted
anywhere else, at home or abroad, out of the Highlands of Scotland, and
the Gaelic-speaking districts of Ireland; but whether, or not, it was
ever adopted in the past we are unable, at the present day, to discover
any trace of such an unnatural, senseless, and, we might say without
exaggeration, idiotic system in any other part of the world. The
disadvantages of such a plan of teaching are so apparent to every one
except those teachers and their friends, who are totally ignorant of the
language of the children they are so well paid to teach and who, from
the manner in which they disregard the necessities of children in
Highland districts, must, we are afraid, be held to place their own
interests and that of their class far above the requirements of the
country; forgetting that the Legislature passed the Education Act not so
much in the interest of teachers as with the view to secure a really
substantial education to the pupils. We much regret that there should be
any necessity to point this out, as the interest of both teachers and
children should be identical; but this clearly cannot be, so long as
teachers maintain and advocate a system contrary to reason and common
sense, and opposed to every system of education throughout the civilized
world; and, indeed, quite the reverse of what they do themselves in the
case of all other languages taught by them, except that of English to
Gaelic-speaking children. When the pupil is sufficiently advanced in
English to justify the teacher in taking up any of the Special Subjects,
does he, for instance, while teaching Latin or Greek, French or German,
begin by throwing aside the knowledge of English already acquired by his
pupil, and commence to teach these foreign languages in the same way
adopted by him in teaching the child English--a language quite as
foreign to him as Latin or Greek, French or German? Does he begin with a
Latin spelling book without any translations in English and teach him
these languages on the same parrot system by which he managed to get him
to pronounce and read English, in most cases without ever having carried
with him the intelligence of his pupils? Not he. He knows better. If he
were foolish enough to teach Latin and other foreign languages in such a
way, he would soon discover that his labours were mainly thrown away,
and that he would earn few special grants by the time his pupils left
him. If it be so very absurd to teach all other languages, on such a
false and ruinous plan, upon what reasonable grounds can the system be
maintained in the case of teaching English to a Gaelic-speaking child?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account