The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In the Netherlands, the opposition to the Bull _Unigenitus_ was
even stronger than in France, representing in fact a substantial
unanimity on the part of the clergy. Under the direction of De Bossu,
the successor of Precipiano as Archbishop of Mechlin, the Church of
Utrecht took the lead in the contest. A series of the writings of the
Netherland divines, which were important only in connection with the
pending question, were placed on the Index promptly after publication.
In Italy, the Bishop of Orvieto was, in 1719, denounced as an opponent
of the Bull, and was imprisoned. After he had formally recanted his
declaration, he was confined for the remainder of his life in a
monastery. In 1724, Innocent XIII was succeeded by Benedict XIII, a
Dominican and a Thomist. The new Pope took steps to allay, through
a more liberal interpretation of the Bull, the antagonisms that had
arisen. A Roman provincial council, called in 1725, arrived, however,
at the conclusion that the Bull must be respected by all the faithful.
In 1728, Noailles, at that time seventy-seven years old, apparently
wearied of the long struggle, recalled his previous protests and
accepted the Bull. He received from the Pope a jubilee Bull and letter
of congratulation. He died the year following. In 1730, the Government
secured the acceptance of the Bull on the part of the Sorbonne by means
of the deprivation, for forty-eight of its antagonists, of the right
to vote. This appears to have brought the matter to a close as far as
France was concerned.
In 1727, died François Paris, a deacon of Paris, who was credited
with having worked a series of miracles. Paris had been known in Rome
as an active opponent of the Bull _Unigenitus_. The Inquisition
took prompt action therefore in condemning, in 1731, the _Memoirs
of Paris_, and various records of his miracles. He was described
as a stubborn Jansenist, a schismatic, and a heretic, and his “false
miracles” as calculated to injure the faith of believers, and to render
them disobedient to the See.
Under Clement XII, were prohibited later a long series of writings
on the miracles. Under Benedict XIV, were placed upon the Index,
among other works on the same subject, a record of the life of Jean
Soanen and his _Testament Spirituel_; a narrative of the miracles
produced in the person of Marianne Pollet; the posthumous works of the
Bishop of Babylon, on the ground of the consideration given in these
to certain miracles that had been worked against the Archbishop of
Sens. In 1755, a convention of the French clergy gave consideration
to the question of the treatment to be given to the opponents of the
Bull, more particularly with reference to the administration of the
sacraments. The majority opinion was in favour of mild measures. The
conclusions were submitted to Rome, and the decision given by Benedict
XIV confirmed the policy of the mildest possible treatment of the
minority party.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account