The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
And finally, the University of Paris, for centuries the most
important in Europe, contended through a long series of years that
the supervision and control of the book-trade of the kingdom was
a university matter, and it succeeded for a series of years, with
occasional exceptions and set-backs, in maintaining this contention
very largely until, with the gradual extension of the powers of the
Crown, the direction of censorship and of privileges had been, with
nearly all other divisions of government, brought directly under royal
authority.
More than one scholar has been quoted as saying that the intellectual
life and development of Europe during the centuries between 1556 and
1800 could be traced by the lists of condemned books, and that these
books would in themselves constitute a fairly complete library for the
thoughtful student. There might be ground for complaint that, owing to
the remissness or ignorance of the censors, the lists included titles
of a number of works not valuable enough to deserve condemnation, and
omitted many of real value and continued importance. Irrespective of
such inconsiderable exceptions in one direction or another, there can,
I judge, be no question that a very large proportion, one may say by
far the largest proportion, of the world’s literature that stood for
intellectual activity and insight, literature which expressed the
conclusions of the greatest minds of their several generations, and
which stood for the development and the civilisation of the community
itself, had been placed by the Church in the Index of condemned and
prohibited books. Comparatively few of these books of light and
leading had been omitted (and those apparently through inadvertence)
and comparatively few books had been included which, apart from any
questions of heresy or pernicious doctrine, would, under a standard
not theological, be classed as dangerous or unwholesome for the
community. In fact, the service of the Index in suppressing or in
discouraging books _contra bonos mores_ may be characterised as
unimportant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account