The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
I have referred to the service to literature and to the intellectual
development of mankind (a service none the less important because it
was so entirely unintended) brought about through the action of the
Church in preparing Indexes that served to chronicle the books of the
thinkers and thus to preserve and extend their teachings. It is natural
to enquire to what extent this service was offset by the interference
with literary production and distribution caused by the burdens of
censorship and by the repressive measures of the inquisitors and other
censors. To such an enquiry there can be no very satisfactory answer.
The materials or data for any precise calculation do not exist. In the
chapter on the Index and the Book-trade, I have however presented such
general data as I have been able to secure concerning the effect of the
censorship regulations upon the operations in different States of the
printer-publishers and the booksellers.
It is evident that the extent of the influence of the system is not
to be measured by the number of books condemned after publication
or after being put into type. It is probable that the restrictions
and detriments placed in the way of literary production constituted
a more important influence on the intellectual life and development
of the people than the cancellation or expurgation of books that had
already come into existence. These latter might be reprinted, and to
a considerable extent were reprinted, in other countries, in which
case their authors would be able to feel that their work had not been
altogether without results. But the influence of the writers who were
deterred from writing, and of the lecturers who were afraid to continue
to speak, was lost not only for their own community but for their own
development, unless, as from time to time happened, they preferred
banishment to repression and silence. Whether the leaders of thought
were expatriated or were silenced, the effect in the home country on
the university centres and on the so-called educated circles was the
same.
At the very time when in Italy, France, Germany, and the Low Countries
the intellectual activities were greater than ever before known, and
minds working in new directions of research were expressing themselves
in varied and suggestive literary productions, scholarship in Spain
had been confined in a few fixed channels, its expression had become
stilted and reiterative, and the literature of thought, imagination,
and opinion had almost disappeared. It would be interesting to
ascertain whether an intelligent Romanist of to-day, who believed
conscientiously in the necessity, or at least in the wisdom, of
ecclesiastical censorship, would be prepared to accept as satisfactory
the results of such a system in the one country in which it had been
carried on with any measure of consistency and thoroughness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account