The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
During the period known as the Middle Ages, a period which, for
the purposes of this study, can be considered as comprising the
centuries from the 9th to the 15th, a long series of condemnations
and prohibitions of books were ordered by various ecclesiastical
authorities. The brief list here given, as a link in the record of
Church censorship, presents certain types or examples of the attempts
made, in advance of any system of general Indexes, to supervise,
control, and restrict the production and distribution of literature.
_830–840._ During these years, measures were taken against Claudius,
Bishop of Turin, and Agobardus, Archbishop of Lyons, on the ground of
their heretical writings, but these last were not formally condemned.
_849._ Gottschalk, a German monk, was, at the instance of Hincmar,
Archbishop of Rheims, excommunicated and condemned to imprisonment for
life, on the ground of his treatise against certain doctrines of St.
Augustine. Gottschalk died in a dungeon about 869. The Index of 1559
places Claudius in the first class, in which he has the honour of being
the earliest author. This entry is continued in the Index of 1564 and
later. The name of Agobardus first finds place in the Index of 1605,
and there only in connection with the _editio princeps_ of his works
printed in 1605. The edition of 1666, and the later issues, failed
to receive formal condemnation. Gottschalk’s treatise escaped the
attention of the Index compilers.
_1050._ _The Synod of Vercelli_ condemns the treatise by Berengar of
Tours on the Lords Supper, and also the work by Ratramnus of Corbu
(written some two centuries earlier) entitled _De Corpore et Sanguine
Christi_.[22] The former book came under various later condemnations.
_1059._ _A Synod at Rome_ compels Berengar himself to burn the thesis
he had written in defence of his position.
_1120._ _A Synod at Soissons_ compels Abelard to burn his treatise,
_Introductio in Theologiam_.
_1140._ _Innocent III_ orders the burning of the writings of Abelard
and of Arnold of Brescia, and the confinement of the two authors in
monasteries.
_1148._ _A Synod at Rheims_ condemns four chapters of the Commentary
by Gilbert de la Porrée on the treatise by Boethius, _de Trinitate_.
Gilbert had proposed to make in the book such corrections as the pope
might order; but the pope had refused to assume the task. Hefele speaks
of this as the first known instance of an attempt to relieve a text
from condemnation by means of expurgation. Gilbert does not find place
in any of the official Indexes but is recorded by Lutzenburg.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account