The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
Pressensé, _Le Concile du Vatican_, printed in 1872, prohibited in 1876.
In 1870, the general Congregation published a protest, signed by a
number of members of the council, calling for the specific condemnation
of a series of newspapers, articles, and pamphlets in which the work
of the council had been criticised. The secretary of the Congregation
of the Index reported, however, that it did not seem wise to take
action. During the years 1871 and 1872, were, however, condemned by
the Inquisition a number of periodical articles on the work of the
council by such authors as Lord Acton, Berchtold, Friedrich, Ruckgaber,
Schulte, Zirngiebl, and others.
=48. Example of a License.=--A license given by the inquisitor-general
of Spain to Dr. Andrew Sall in June, 1652, states that he was
permitted to keep and to read prohibited books for use in connection
with the writing of any doctrinal or devotional books or treatises.
The holder of the license was charged with the duty of giving
information to his Grace of any censurable propositions that he might
find in books, ancient or modern, which might not already have been
comprehended in the expurgatory Index. The license was marked as
duly entered in the record of licenses, the page (Number 138) giving
indication of a considerable series of licenses outstanding. These
instruments were renewed from year to year. Dr. Sall relates that with
the second grant came a complaint that he had reported no censurable
propositions. He had excused himself by saying that he had not had
in his hands any Protestant books; but he gave specification of some
perverse and apparently heretical doctrines he had found in certain
books which were approved and were much in use with themselves. He gave
as an example citations from the Commentaries on Esther by de Murcia:
_Etiam Deus Op. Max. proposita ante oculos morte in meliora contendat_;
and
_Etiam demon morte ante oculos constituta contendit in meliora_.[56]
Sleumer gives the following example of the form in force to-day (1906)
for an application for the permission to read forbidden books.
“To the very reverend Vicar-General of the diocese: The undersigned
respectfully request permission for the reading of certain books which
have been specifically forbidden in the Index or which in their class
come under the general provisions of the Index. The requirement is
based upon the following grounds:...
“The undersigned feels assured that the proposed use of this forbidden
literature may be made by him on these grounds without any undermining
of his faith or any interference with his conscientious duty to the
Holy Church.”[57]
CHAPTER VIII
THE CENSORSHIP OF THE STATE AND CENSORSHIP BY
PROTESTANTS
1. General.
2. Catholic States: Catholic Germany, France, Spain and Portugal.
3. Protestant States: Switzerland, Protestant Germany, Holland,
Scandinavia, England.
4. Summary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account