The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
Fig. 102 is a kiln of a different construction. “In it, instead of
modelling or moulding bricks for the kiln, the potters, after forming
a tolerably round shaft, commenced plastering it three inches thick
with clay, prepared for that purpose, leaving a flange twenty inches
above the furnace floor to receive the floor of the kiln; a mode of
construction unnoticed by me before in these kilns. In the centre
was placed an oval pedestal, for the double purpose of dividing the
fire and of giving support to the centre of the floor. To attach the
pedestal to the back of the kiln, and to shut out the cold air which
would lodge in the angle formed by the pedestal being so placed, the
angle was filled with coarse materials, which were stopped up with
clay, so as to draw the flame more towards the centre, and induce a
union with the flame and heat entering the front part of the kiln.”
The more usual plan with the potters of this district in packing their
kilns was, when the contents had reached the surface of the earth, to
form a dome by covering the urns and vases lightly with dry grass,
sedge, or the like, and plastering it over with patches of prepared
clay, divided by strewing a small quantity of hay between each portion
to facilitate removal. In place of this usual process, in this kiln
bricks were used of an oblong shape, four inches by two and a half
inches, wedge-shaped at one end, with a sufficient curve to traverse
the circumference when set edgeways, with the wedge ends lapped over
each other. The sides would be thus raised for three or four courses
or more, as circumstances might require, and probably be afterwards
backed up with loose earth. These bricks were modelled and kneaded with
chaff and grain.”[10] The numbers indicate as follows:--1, front of
the pedestal supporting the floor of the kiln; 2 2, slopes, probably
intended to produce a more uniform heat; 3 3, part of the kiln floor;
4, bricks, before used; 5, area of the furnace; 6, mouth of furnace; 7,
wall of kiln; 8, top of the pedestal. The mouth of the furnace, No. 6,
was arched over.
The ware of the Durobrivian potteries was superior both in style of
art and in form and material to that of Upchurch, and has an especial
interest over it in the fact that it bears figures and various
ornaments in relief, in the same manner as on the Samian ware. The
ornament, especially the scrolls, &c., were laid on “in slip.” The
vessel, after having been thrown on the wheel, would be allowed to
become somewhat firm, but only sufficiently so for the purpose of the
lathe. In the indented ware, the indenting would have to be performed
with the vessel in as pliable a state as it could be taken from the
lathe. A thick slip of the same body would then be procured, and the
ornamentation would proceed.
[Illustration: Fig. 103.
Fig. 104.
Fig. 105.
Figs. 106 and 107.
Fig. 108.
Fig. 109.
Fig. 110.
Representations of Field Sports on Castor Ware.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account