The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
_Neale._--Neale, the successor of Palmer, continued the business
at Hanley, and produced many remarkably good and artistic articles
in basalt, in jasper, and in other wares, and became, if possible,
even a more close and clever imitator of Wedgwood’s wares than his
predecessor had been. In 1780 he appears to have had two partners, and
to have carried on the business under the style of “Neale, Maidment,
and Bailey,” and, later, as “Neale & Bailey” and “Neale and Wilson.”
Usually, however, the firm was simply “Neale & Co.” Neale’s productions
are much esteemed for the excellence of the body, the cleverness of
design, and the sharpness of their execution. His cream-coloured
earthenware, too, is of very good and fine quality. He was succeeded,
I believe, by his partner Wilson. The marks used by Neale, so far as I
have met with them, are “Neale & Co.,” sometimes in large and at others
in small sized letters, impressed in the ware; _NEALE & CO._ in italic
capital letters, also impressed; NEALE & CO. in Roman capital letters,
also impressed; and “Neale & Wilson.” Another mark was, like Palmer’s,
adopted, in form, from Wedgwood & Bentley. It is a circle, bearing the
name in raised letters.
[Illustration: Fig. 456.]
* * * * *
[Illustration: Fig. 457.]
_Wilson._--Robert Wilson, the successor to the firm of Neale & Wilson,
continued the manufactory, but devoted himself mainly to cream-coloured
earthenware, more or less decorated. His name is occasionally met with
simply as WILSON impressed in the body of the ware, and occasionally
in connection with a crown and the distinctive mark C (Fig. 457).
Robert Wilson was for a long time sole manager to Neales; and he,
and the still more celebrated potter, Elijah Mayer, whose works and
residence were just opposite the Church Works, married two sisters of
the name of Mayer, but of different families. After the retirement or
death of Wilson his brother David carried on the works (1802). It was
afterwards D. Wilson & Sons; then Assignees of Wilson; then Phillips
& Bagster. The Phillips of this firm was Jacob, brother to Jonathan
Phillips, of Oxford Street, London, and uncle to the present Messrs.
Phillips of Oxford Street. The firm was then Bagster alone for a while,
after which the manufactory and house adjoining, where Bagster had
resided, came into the market and were purchased by Joseph Mayer, son
and successor of Elijah Mayer, whose works and residence, as I said
before, were immediately opposite the road. The Church Works were
then (1831) rented by William Ridgway & Co., Mr. Ridgway being Joseph
Mayer’s cousin; and I should here mention that Job Ridgway, the father
of William and John Ridgway, had married the sister of Elijah Mayer,
Joseph’s father. Joseph Mayer had in his employ a clever modeller named
Leonard James Abington, who was also a fair chemist, and so much in
favour with his employer that the latter placed him in partnership with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account