The Chaldean account of Genesis : $b Containing the description of the creation, the fall of man, the deluge, the tower of Babel, the times of the patriarchsSmith, George
Religion
The Chaldean account of Genesis : $b Containing the description of the creation, the fall of man, the deluge, the tower of Babel, the times of the patriarchs
If anything were needed to confirm the solar character of Izdubar and
his history, it would be afforded by a comparison with the legends of
the Greek solar hero, Herakles. Like much else of Greek mythology, the
twelve adventures of Herakles were brought to Greece from Babylonia
through the hands of the Phœnicians, and it has long been recognized
that Herakles is but a form of Baal Melkarth, the sun-god of Tyre.
Hea-bani reappears in Cheiron, the centaur, the friend and instructor
of Herakles, and just as Hea-bani was created by Hea, Cheiron was said
to be the son of Kronos, who is identified by Berosus with Hea in the
account of the Deluge. The lion slain by Izdubar is the lion of Nemea
slain by Herakles; the winged bull made by Anu is the famous bull of
Krete; the tyrant Khumbaba is the tyrant Geryon; the gems borne by the
trees of the forest beyond the gateway of the sun are the apples of the
Hesperides; and the deadly sickness of Izdubar himself is but the fever
of Herakles, caused by the poisoned tunic of Nessus.
A very slight inspection of the Epic is sufficient to show that it
has been pieced together out of a number of previously existing and
independent materials. Thus the history of the Deluge, which is itself
but an episode somewhat violently foisted into the legend of Izdubar
in order to preserve the astronomical arrangement of the Epic, may be
shown to have consisted of at least two older poems on the subject; and
a careful examination of other portions of the Epic brings the same
fact to light elsewhere.
As, however, there is clear proof that the Epic was originally composed
in Accadian, our present text being merely the Semitic translation of
the Accadian original, it must have existed in the form in which we now
have it before the age of Sargon and the extinction of the Accadian
language in Chaldea. We shall not be far wrong, therefore, in ascribing
its composition to about B.C. 2000, or a little earlier. The older
lays or poems out of which it was formed must therefore date before
this period. There seems to have been a considerable number of them,
each incident in the cycle of ancient Accadian mythology having been
the subject of various poems. Many of these originated in different
parts of the country, so that a long period of time must be allowed for
their growth and subsequent reduction to a literary form. But as the
legends they celebrated were traditions in the country before they were
embodied in poems and committed to writing, we must go back to quite a
remote epoch for their first starting-point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account