There is nothing in these letters to show what rule had been established.
All that is laid down is that the Pascha should be kept everywhere on
the same day; and it assumed that the Roman and Alexandrian rules as to
Easter were identical, and were well known. As a matter of fact, while
the Churches of Rome and Alexandria were at one both in keeping Easter on
a Sunday, and on a Sunday after the vernal equinox, they were not agreed
in their methods of calculating the Sunday upon which Easter would fall.
Hence, long after the Council of Nicaea, several instances occur in which
a day was taken for the Easter festival at Rome which differed from the
day which the Alexandrian experts had calculated to be the correct day.
It is worthy of observation that the Emperor in his letter reprobates
what he assumes was the Jewish practice of frequently celebrating two
Paschas in the same year. What is probably meant is that the Jews at that
time (whatever their earlier practice may have been) did not think it
necessary to keep the Passover _after_ the vernal equinox. Now the vernal
equinox was taken as the beginning of the tropical or solar year; and it
might happen from time to time that the full moon of Nisan fell in one
year after the vernal equinox, and in the following civil year before
the equinox, which would give two passovers in the same solar year. If
this interpretation of the words of Constantine’s letter be correct, it
would imply that the Christian Pascha should always be celebrated after
the equinox, which was certainly already the general practice. But no
specific rule with reference to the equinox is laid down in express terms
either by the Fathers of the Council or by the Emperor.
It will be observed that in the Letter of Constantine he states that the
Lord has left us ‘only one festal day of our deliverance, that is to
say, of his holy passion.’ The dominant thought connected with the word
Pascha was still that of the Crucifixion. At a later period writers, for
the sake of accuracy, made the distinction between the ‘Pascha of the
Crucifixion’ (πάσχα σταυρώσιμον) and the ‘Pascha of the Resurrection’
(πάσχα ἀναστάσιμον); and eventually the thought of the Crucifixion
disappears from the connotation of the word, which has given the name for
what we call Easter to the French (_pâques_); the Italians (_pasqua_);
and the Spaniards (_pascua_)[159].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account