The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed. — John Shaqi
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
Besides the princes and knights, there is a very important [Sidenote:
The imperial cities.] body of tenants-in-chief—the _Reichstädte_, or
imperial cities. These had risen to importance, partly through the
economic conditions which gave them wealth, and partly through the
policy of several of the Emperors, who had encouraged the growth of
municipal life as a source of revenue and as a check upon the power of
the princes. German cities may be divided roughly into two great groups:
those in the south, like Augsburg, Nürnberg, Ratisbon, etc., which
obtained importance from their position on the great commercial routes
leading from Venice and Genoa to different parts of Europe; and those in
the north, on the Baltic and the German Ocean, whose function was to
carry on the trade between the east and the west of Northern Europe, and
to exchange at Bruges the products of the north for the commodities
brought by the southern merchants (see p. 422). The strength of the
towns lay in their wealth and their walls; their weakness in their
isolation and mutual jealousy. This weakness the southern cities never
overcame; their leagues for common objects were never durable, and
therefore never effectual. But the northern towns were left more to
themselves: they came into contact with less developed states, and they
were subject to the pressure of more constant and more immediate
political interests. The necessity of securing trade privileges in the
countries lying to the east and west of the Baltic, and the duty of
defending their commercial routes against the aggressive Scandinavian
state of Denmark, which commanded the outlets from the Baltic, forced
the northern towns into a semi-federal union, and the Hanseatic League
became for a time a great political power in the north. In the end the
northern cities also succumbed, owing mainly to a great change in trade
routes, and partly to the growing predominance of the princes. But at
the beginning of this period the future destiny of the German towns was
unknown, and to contemporaries it seemed quite possible that cities like
Nürnberg and Augsburg, or Lübeck and Hamburg, might obtain an
independence and a power not markedly inferior to that which was
actually acquired at this time by Venice and Florence, which were in
theory equally tenants-in-chief of the Empire, though further removed
from the exercise of imperial authority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account