The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
The decline of the German kingship had begun in the [Sidenote: The
Interregnum and its results.] eleventh century, but a partial revival
had been effected by the great Hohenstaufen Emperors, Frederick
Barbarossa, Henry VI., and Frederick II. With the fall of the
Hohenstaufen both Empire and monarchy sank lower than they had ever done
before. During the Great Interregnum (1256-1273), two rival kings, the
Englishman Richard of Cornwall, and the Castilian king, Alfonso X., had
secured the nominal adherence of conflicting parties in Germany, but
neither had attempted to rule the country. In these years not only did
the tenants-in-chief enjoy complete independence of any external
authority, but the imperial domains were either annexed by the princes,
or squandered by the two royal claimants in the attempt to purchase
adherents. This rendered it impossible to revive the old monarchy, and
produced changes which seemed to render German unity for ever hopeless.
Hitherto the elected Emperor had resigned his hereditary dominions, and
had supported himself on the domain-lands, travelling about from one
estate to another. This was no longer possible. The only way in which a
future king could hope to secure any respect or obedience was to acquire
such a territorial power as would make him formidable. Such a policy,
consistently pursued by a line of hereditary kings, might have resulted
in the gradual formation of a territorial monarchy like that of France.
But the princes made use of their right of election, at first to prevent
the kingship passing to successive members of the same family, and
always to impose conditions which should secure their own independence.
The evil results became abundantly plain in the century which followed
the Interregnum. Each successive Emperor set himself, not so much to
strengthen the monarchy, as to aggrandise his own family; and the more
successful he was, the more dangerous and objectionable did that family
become to his successor. The same conditions which produced nepotism in
the Papacy, led to the adoption of a consistent policy of dynastic
aggrandisement by all the Emperors from Rudolf of Hapsburg onwards.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account