[13] On the Attic standard, adopted by Alexander, the Seleucid and
Bactrian kings, the drachm weighed 67·5 grains; on the Persian
standard, adopted by the Indo-Greeks (and hence in some works called
the Indian standard), it weighed 88 grains, but their coins rarely
reach the full weight. Mr. Whitehead, in a recent monograph, “The
Pre-Muhammadan Coinage of North-Western India” (_Numismatic Notes
and Monographs_, No. 13, The American Numismatic Society, New York,
1922), calls the two silver denominations of the Indo-Greeks drachms
and tetradrachms, thus supposing a separate Indian standard. I have
retained the hitherto accepted nomenclature, hemidrachms and didrachms
for convenience of reference to standard works.
Demetrios was the first Bactrian king to strike square copper coins
of the Indian type, with a legend in Greek on the obverse, and in
Kharoshṭhī on the reverse. His rival, Eukratides, struck these
bilingual square copper pieces in greater abundance, as well as a
very rare silver coin with inscriptions in both languages. The
Gandhāra copper coinage of Agathokles and Pantaleon (Pl. II, 2) has
already been alluded to. After the removal of the seat of government
to territory south of the Hindu Kush, we find the coinage undergoing a
radical change. The rare gold staters and the splendid tetradrachms of
Bactria disappear. The silver coins of the Indo-Greeks, as these later
princes may conveniently be called, are the didrachm (Pl. II, 5) and
the hemidrachm. With the exception of certain square hemidrachms of
Apollodotos and Philoxenos (Pl. II, 7), they are all round, are struck
to the Persian (or Indian) standard, and all have inscriptions in both
Greek and Kharoshṭhī characters. Copper coins, square for the most
part, are very numerous (Pl. II, 6). The devices are almost entirely
Greek, and must have been engraved by Greeks, or Indians trained in
the Greek traditions, yet “the engravers ... were no slavish copyists
of Western models, but were giving free and spontaneous expression to
their own ideas.”[14] On the reverse is ordinarily to be found some god
or goddess—Herakles, Zeus, Pallas, or some symbol of their worship;
the “two piloi” (caps) of the Dioskouroi are of frequent occurrence.
A notable square copper coin of Eukratides has the figure of a seated
Zeus, accompanied by the legend in Kharoshṭhī, “_The city deity of
Kāpiśī_,” suggesting that others of these deities may stand as the
patrons of cities.[15] Other reverse devices are the tripod, a king on
horseback, and various animals, including the specially Indian elephant
and humped bull. The portraits on the obverse, especially on the fine
didrachms, are realistic and boldly drawn, and show us clearly what
manner of men these early European rulers in India were. On most of
these coins and those of the Śaka rulers are found a great variety
of monograms (Fig. 3) formed of Greek letters, but the significance
of these has never been satisfactorily explained. From a study of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account