The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09: Tangential ViewsBierce, Ambrose
General
The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09: Tangential Views
Bierce, Ambrose
American essays; American literature
There are two George Washingtons—the natural and the artificial. They
are now equally “great,” but the former was choke-full of the old Adam.
He swore like “our army in Flanders,” loved a bottle like a brother
and had an inter-colonial reputation as a lady-killer. He was, indeed,
a singularly interesting and magnetic old boy—one whom any sane and
honest lover of the picturesque in life and character would deem it
an honor and an education to have known in the flesh. He is now known
to but few; you must dig pretty deeply into the tumulus of rubbishy
panegyric—scan pretty closely the inedited annals of his time, in order
to see him as he was. Criss-crossed upon these failing parchments of
the past are the lines of the sleek Philistine, the smug patriot
and the lessoning moraler, making a palimpsest whereof all that is
legible is false and all that is honest is blotted out. The detestable
anthropolater of the biographical gift has pushed his glowing pen
across the page, to the unspeakable darkening of counsel. In short,
Washington’s countrymen see him through a glass dirtily. The image is
unlovely and unloved. You can no more love and revere the memory of the
biographical George Washington than you can an isosceles triangle or a
cubic foot of interstellar space.
The portrait-painters began it—Gilbert Stuart and the rest of them.
They idealized all the humanity out of the poor patriot’s face and
passed him down to the engravers as a rather sleepy-looking butcher’s
block. There is not a portrait of Washington extant which a man of
taste and knowledge would suffer to hang on the wall of his stable.
Then the historians jumped in, raping all the laurels from the brows of
the man’s great contemporaries and piling them in confusion upon his
pate. They made him a god in wisdom, and a giant in arms; whereas, in
point of ability and service, he was but little, if at all, superior to
any one of a half-dozen of his now over-shadowed but once illustrious
co-workers in council and camp, and in no way comparable with Hamilton.
He towers above his fellows because he stands upon a pile of books.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account