The collected works of Henrik Ibsen, Vol. 01 (of 11)Ibsen, Henrik
General
The collected works of Henrik Ibsen, Vol. 01 (of 11)
Ibsen, Henrik
Ibsen, Henrik, 1828-1906 -- Translations into English; Norwegian drama -- Translations into English
_First printed (Collected Edition)_ 1908
_Second Impression_ 1910
_Copyright_ 1908 _by William Heinemann_
CONTENTS
PAGE
GENERAL PREFACE vii
INTRODUCTION TO “LADY INGER OF ÖSTRÅT” xvii
INTRODUCTION TO “THE FEAST AT SOLHOUG” xxxiii
INTRODUCTION TO “LOVE’S COMEDY” xxxvii
“LADY INGER OF ÖSTRÅT” 1
_Translated by_ CHARLES ARCHER
“THE FEAST AT SOLHOUG” 181
_Translated by_
WILLIAM ARCHER and MARY MORISON
“LOVE’S COMEDY” 285
_Translated by_ C. H. HERFORD
GENERAL PREFACE
The eleven volumes of this edition contain all, save one, of the
dramas which Henrik Ibsen himself admitted to the canon of his
works. The one exception is his earliest, and very immature,
tragedy, _Catilina_, first published in 1850, and republished in
1875. This play is interesting in the light reflected from the
poet’s later achievements, but has little or no inherent value. A
great part of its interest lies in the very crudities of its style,
which it would be a thankless task to reproduce in translation.
Moreover, the poet impaired even its biographical value by largely
rewriting it before its republication. He did not make it, or
attempt to make it, a better play, but he in some measure corrected
its juvenility of expression. Which version, then, should a
translator choose? To go back to the original would seem a
deliberate disregard of the poet’s wishes; while, on the other hand,
the retouched version is clearly of far inferior interest. It seemed
advisable, therefore, to leave the play alone, so far as this
edition was concerned. Still more clearly did it appear unnecessary
to include _The Warrior’s Barrow_ and _Olaf Liliekrans_, two early
plays which were never admitted to any edition prepared by the poet
himself. They were included in a Supplementary Volume of the
Norwegian collected edition, issued in 1902, when Ibsen’s life-work
was over. They have even less intrinsic value than _Catilina_, and
ought certainly to be kept apart from the works by which he desired
to be remembered. A fourth youthful production, _St. John’s Night_,
remains to this day in manuscript. Not even German piety has dragged
it to light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account