The collected works of Henrik Ibsen, Vol. 04 (of 11)Ibsen, Henrik
General
The collected works of Henrik Ibsen, Vol. 04 (of 11)
Ibsen, Henrik
Ibsen, Henrik, 1828-1906 -- Translations into English; Norwegian drama -- Translations into English
Petersen’s review is noteworthy, not for its own sake, but for the
effect it produced on Ibsen. His letters to Björnson on the subject are
the most vivid and spontaneous he ever wrote. Björnson happened to be in
Copenhagen when Petersen’s article appeared in _Fœdrelandet_, and Ibsen
seems somehow to have blamed him for not preventing its appearance. “All
I reproach you with,” he says, “is inaction.” But Petersen he accuses of
lack of “loyalty,” of “an intentional crime against truth and justice.”
“There is a lie involved in Clemens Petersen’s article, not in what he
says, but in what he refrains from saying. And he intentionally refrains
from saying a great deal.... Tell me, now, is Peer Gynt himself not a
personality, complete and individual? _I_ know that he is. And the
mother; is she not?” But the most memorable passage in this memorable
letter is the following piece of splendid arrogance: “My book _is_
poetry; and if it is not, then it will be. The conception of poetry in
our country, in Norway, shall be made to conform to the book.” It
certainly seems that any definition of poetry which should be so framed
as to exclude _Peer Gynt_ must have something of what Petersen himself
called “Tankesvindel” about it.
Ibsen’s burst of indignation relieved his mind, and three weeks later we
find him writing, half apologetically, of the “cargo of nonsense” he had
“shipped off” to Björnson, immediately on reading Petersen’s review. He
even sends a friendly “greeting” to the offending critic. But this is
his last (published) letter to Björnson for something like fifteen
years. How far the reception of _Peer Gynt_ may have contributed to the
breach between them, I do not know. Björnson’s own criticism of the
poem, as we shall presently see, was very favourable.
_Peer Gynt_ was not, on its appearance, quite so popular as Brand. A
second edition was called for in a fortnight; but the third edition did
not appear until 1874, by which time the seventh edition of _Brand_ was
already on the market. Before the end of the century ten editions of
_Peer Gynt_ had appeared in Copenhagen as against fourteen of _Brand_.
The first German translation appeared in 1881, and the present English
translation in 1892. A French translation, by Count Prozor, appeared in
the _Nouvelle Revue_ in 1896, but does not seem to have been published
in book form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account