The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
As the passions are said to be subject to the control of reason, and as
reason is resolved (in the present case) into an attention to our own
interest, or a practical sense of the value of money, it will not be
amiss to inquire how much of this principle itself is founded in a
rational estimate of things, or is calculated for the end it proposes,
or how much of it will turn out (when analysed) to be mere madness and
folly or a mixture, like all the rest, of obstinacy, whim, fancy,
vanity, ill-nature, and so forth, or a nominal pursuit of good. This
passion, or an inordinate love of wealth, shows itself, when it is
strong, equally in two opposite ways, in saving or in spending—in
avarice (or stinginess) and in extravagance. To examine each of their
order. That lowest and most familiar form of covetousness, commonly
called _stinginess_, is at present (it must be owned) greatly on the
wane in civilised society; it has been driven out of fashion either by
ridicule and good sense, or by the spread of luxury, or by supplying the
mind with other sources of interest, besides those which related to the
bare means of subsistence, so that it may almost be considered as a
vice, or absurdity, struck off the list, as a set-off to some that, in
the change of manners and the progress of dissipation have been brought
upon the stage. It is not, however, so entirely banished from the world,
but that examples of it may be found to our purpose. It seems to have
taken refuge in the petty provincial towns, or in old baronial castles
in the North of Scotland, where it is still triumphant. To go into this
subject somewhat in detail, as a study of the surviving manners of the
last age.—Nothing is more common in these half-starved, barren regions,
than to stint the servants in their wages, to allowance them in the
merest necessaries, never to indulge them with a morsel of savoury food,
and to lock up every thing from them as if they were thieves, or common
vagabonds, broke into the house. The natural consequence is, that the
mistresses live in continual _hot water_ with their servants, keep watch
and ward over them—the pantry is in a state of siege—grudge them every
mouthful, every appearance of comfort, or moment of leisure, and torment
their own souls every minute of their lives about what, if left wholly
to itself, would not make a difference of five shillings at the year’s
end. There are families so notorious for this kind of _surveillance_ and
meanness, that no servant will go to live with them; for, to clench the
matter, they are obliged to stay if they do; as, under these amiable
establishments, and to provide against an evasion of their signal
advantages, domestics are never hired but by the half-year. Instances
have been known where servants have taken a pleasant revenge on their
masters and mistresses without intending it; but where the example of
sordid saving and meanness set to them, having taken possession of those
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account