The College, the Market, and the Court: or, Woman's relation to education, labor and lawDall, Caroline Wells Healey
History
The College, the Market, and the Court: or, Woman's relation to education, labor and law
Dall, Caroline Wells Healey
Women -- Education; Women -- Employment; Women -- Legal status, laws, etc.
"But," says some watchful woman, "has not Miss Garrett taken her
degree from Apothecaries' Hall? and have not a few women at least been
trained as sick nurses?"
There is still no _institution_ for the training of sick nurses, as
the text asserts. Some few have been trained in hospitals and the
like, on conditions of service, or to supply the need of such
institutions themselves. How does the matter stand with Miss Garrett?
The press has made the most of her success: it lies with us to exhibit
the naked truth. After applying in vain to the various medical
colleges, Miss Garrett went to Apothecaries' Hall. Here they refused
her; but she looked up their charter. She found the word indicating to
whom degrees should be granted indeterminate, with no character of sex
attached to it. Lawyers told her the hall must grant her a degree, or
surrender its charter. She was wealthy, and in earnest. She pushed her
advantage. "The Apothecaries' Hall" prescribed certain courses of
instruction to be pursued and certified before the degree could be
granted. These she pursued in private, paying the most exorbitant
rates for her instruction. In one instance, for a course of lectures,
to which a man's fee would have been _five_ guineas, she paid _fifty_;
and I am credibly informed that the round cost of these preparatory
steps must have amounted to two thousand pounds. All honor to Miss
Garrett! Should her genius as a physician equal her energy and her
wealth, she may gain something for the cause she has espoused, by the
honor and consideration she will win for her sex. Apart from this, it
will be seen, she has gained nothing. Bribery is not possible to
ordinary mortals; and the conditions of the degree, in the present
state of public feeling, would make it wholly impracticable.
The case, as it has been stated to us, is an exemplification, on a
gigantic scale, of all that we complain of; and proves our statement,
that women have not won an education for themselves, till they win
with it its legitimate results. For their opportunities as things now
stand, all over the world, women pay a premium on the terms offered to
men. Let them take these opportunities as tools, and try to win their
bread with them, and the wages offered are, as a rule, a large
discount on those offered to men. Political economy has nothing to do
with the exceptional cases in which this is most evident,--only the
common, habitual idea, that the wages of women must be kept down; and
that, to do it, the value of superior labor must not be recognized, as
in the case of the female teacher quoted in the text.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account