The Common Rocks and Minerals of Missouri — John Shaqi
The Common Rocks and Minerals of MissouriKeller, W. D.
Science
The Common Rocks and Minerals of Missouri
Keller, W. D.
Mineralogy -- Missouri; Petrology -- Missouri
Many tons of limestone are used each year in Missouri as a soil
fertilizer because it neutralizes acidity, coagulates the clay,
furnishes calcium to the plants by way of the colloidal clay, and frees
other chemical elements so that they become available to the plants. No
doubt rocks other than limestone will be crushed and added to the soil
in the future, but today our attention is focussed chiefly on limestone
and dolomite.
The value of a limestone quarry for agricultural purposes depends upon
availability, amount of overburden, purity of the stone, ease of
crushing, and size of deposit. For instance, a stone of 90% purity,
which is close at hand, will probably be more valuable than one of 98%
purity which must be hauled fifteen miles. Bare hillsides or creek banks
where a crusher can be set up to handle the stone without extra lifting
are preferable for quarry sites. Usually the overburden is less in such
an exposed face. Impurities in limestone deposits may be large chert
(flint) nodules which can be hand-sorted out, sand grains, clay which
settled into and onto the stone during its accumulation, and pyrite
(fool’s gold) or other minerals of lesser importance. Clay impurities
simply act as useless extra weight which must be handled. Sand grains,
however, are hard, and will abrade and wear out crushing equipment.
Chert and fine-grained silica likewise are harder than steel and will
wear a crusher excessively. Pure limestone (calcite or dolomite mineral)
has a hardness less than that of steel and will only polish or wear the
metal slightly.
[Illustration: Typical, intermittently-operated, farm limestone
quarry near North Kansas City.]
It will probably pay to give some thought to this matter of crushing
when selecting a quarry site for agricultural limestone. The several
beds of stone available should be tested not only for amount, but kinds
of impurities. Samples sent in for testing must be _representative_ of
the rocks under consideration or the analytical results are meaningless.
The writer does not believe this point can be over-emphasized. Time
after time he has seen samples taken of geological deposits for testing
which no more represented the deposits than a bantam rooster picked out
of a chicken pen would represent the egg-laying or weight-production
possibilities of the flock of Plymouth Rock hens.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account