The Commune of London, and other studiesRound, John Horace
History
The Commune of London, and other studies
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; London (England) -- History -- To 1500
The details of Richard’s coronation do not appear either in
the Red or Black Books of the Exchequer, but they are given by
Benedict Abbas, pp. 557–560, and copied by Hoveden, from whom
Wendover somewhat abridges them, and thence repeated in the
greater Chronicle of Matt. Paris, ed. Wats, p. 153, and Hist.
Ang., ii. 6.[428]
This, it will be seen, hardly commits the writer to the view that some
Exchequer record was, as alleged above, the original authority. But
such, no doubt, might be the inference from this comment on the text.
As important inferences have now been drawn from this error, as I
venture to deem it, we must glance at the actual passage on which the
theory is based.
Unconnected with the narrative of the coronation, which is complete
without it, there is found, in the ‘Historia Anglorum’ (ii. 9) this
marginal note:
Officia prelatorum et magnatum quæ ab antiquo jure et
consuetudine in regum coronationibus sibi vindicant et facere
debent, in rotulis Scaccarii poterunt reperiri.
This obviously refers, not to the narrative in the text, which is that
of the coronation ceremony alone, but to the services performed “by
ancient right and custom” in the king’s house on that occasion. Of
these there is no description in the text. In another work ascribed,
but doubtfully, to Matthew Paris, the so-called “Abbreviatio,” the
coronation is mentioned, but not described; and there is added a
similar note;
Et quia exigit plenitudo historiæ officia quorundam magnatum
qui in coronationibus habent implere, de antiqua consuetudine,
lectorem hujus libelli abbreviati ad historiam transmitto
prolixiorem quæ in consuetudinibus Scaccarii poterit
reperiri.[429]
In both cases, it will be observed, an exchequer record is referred
to solely for the customary offices or services rendered by
certain magnates; and in both cases the present tense and the word
“coronation_ibus_” imply that the reference is general, and is not
merely a description of what happened at Richard’s coronation. Now my
contention is that the record referred to is that of Queen Eleanor’s
coronation in 1236, which is preserved, at the present day, in the
Red Book of the Exchequer, and which was known to Matthew Paris,
who appends to his narrative of the services at that coronation the
marginal note: “Hæc omnia in consuetudinario Scaccarii melius et
plenius reperiuntur.”[430] We actually find in that record the words:
“de prædictis autem officiis nullus sibi jus vendicavit,” etc.,[431]
which at once remind us of the marginal note found in the ‘Historia
Anglorum.’
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account