[309] Ibid. i. 152. [310] Ibid. i. 148, 240. [311] Ibid. i. 245. [312] Ibid. i. 131. [313] MS. Arundel, 28. [314] Rot. Pip. 31 Hen. I. p. 100. [315] Rot. Pip. 31 Hen. I. p. 72. [316] Report, p. 25 _b_. [317] Ramsey Cartulary, i. 256. [318] See p. 101 above. [319] 28th Sept., 1889. [320] The Red Book of the Exchequer, Ed. Hubert Hall, F.S.A., of the Public Record Office (Master of the Rolls Series), pp. cclxvii.-cclxxxiv. [321] This phrase and the “sine judicio,” which the Articles employ as its opposite, should be compared with the formula for the Assize of Novel Disseisin. [322] Rot. Pip. 14 Hen. II. p. 124 (“Honor Willelmi filii Alani”). [323] See ‘Liber Rubeus,’ p. 272. [324] Swereford’s ‘dictum’ is wrong, of course, here as elsewhere (see my ‘Studies on the Red Book’). [325] See, for example, pp. 75–7, 77–8. [326] Or rather 1172 (Rot. Pip., 18 Hen. II.), “1171” being Mr. Hall’s date. [327] Roland de Dinan, Ralf de Toeni, Goscelin the queen’s brother (Rot. 18 Hen. II., p. 132). [328] Rot. 14 Hen. II., p. 194. [329] Rot. 6 Ric. I. (according to Dugdale). [330] Liber Rubeus, pp. 113, 147. [331] Rot. 21 Hen. II., p. 82. [332] History of Shropshire, ii. 201. [333] Feudal England, p. 245; Geoffrey de Mandeville, p. 322. [334] Rot. 14 Hen. II., p. 29. [335] _i.e._ 1172. [336] Rot. 18 Hen. II., p. 30. [337] Genealogist (N. S.), vol. i. [338] See my ‘Studies on the Red Book of the Exchequer’ (1898), printed for private circulation, _passim_. [339] This paper, written a few years ago, is a sketch based on (1) The Song of Dermot and the Earl. Edited by G. A. Orpen. Oxford, 1892. (2) Giraldi Cambrensis Opera, vol. v. Edited by J. F. Dimock. London, 1867. (3) The Book of Howth. Edited by J. S. Brewer, 1871. [340] English Historical Review, vol. iv. [341] See the paper below on ‘The Marshalship of England.’ [342] English Historical Review, viii. 132. [343] See my ‘Early Life of Anne Boleyn.’ [344] Romania, xxi. 444–451. [345] See ‘Feudal England,’ pp. 516–518. [346] Morant’s Essex, i. 331 note. Morant gives no reference for this early and interesting charter, but I have lately been fortunate enough to find it in Lansd. MS. fo. 170, where it is transcribed among some local records from “Placita corone, 13 Edw. I.” It must, therefore, have been produced in 1284–5. [347] Son of the earl of Arundel. [348] MS. Hargrave 313, fo. 44 _d_ (pencil). [349] Selden Society publications, iv. 17. [350] See also ‘Feudal England.’ Mr. Oman, of course, questions my theory; but scholars, I understand, accept it (see pp. 56–7 above). [351] See also my paper on “The Barons of the Naas” in ‘Genealogist.’ [352] 14th March, 1895.