The Commune of London, and other studiesRound, John Horace
History
The Commune of London, and other studies
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; London (England) -- History -- To 1500
Indeed, in
my experience, the charters of the 12th century prove that Domesday
nomenclature is thoroughly deserving of trust. The climax of Kemble’s
derivations is reached perhaps in Shillingstone, from which Dorset
village he duly deduces the ‘Scyllingas.’ For, as Eyton has shown,
its name was ‘Acford,’ but, from its Domesday tenant, Schelin, it
became known as Ockford Eskelling, Shilling Ockford, and finally, by
a yet bolder corruption, Shillingstone.[42] As if to make matters
worse, Kemble treats ‘Shilling-Okeford’ and ‘Shillingstone’ as two
distinct places. Could anything, one asks, be more unfortunate than
this? Alas, one must answer Yes. The great clan of the ‘Cypingas’ is
found in eight counties: at least so Kemble says. I have tested his
list and discovered that the names which prove the existence of his
clan are Chipping Ongar, Chipping Barnet, Chipping Sodbury, Chipping
Campden, Chipping Wycombe, Chipping Warden, and Chipping Norton. Even
the historical tyro would avoid this wild blunder; he would know that
Chipping was about as much of a clan name as is Cheapside. After this
final example, it can hardly be disputed that Kemble’s lists are merely
a pitfall for the unwary.
Yet we still follow in his footsteps. Take such a case as that
of Faringdon, which Mr. Grant Allen, we have seen, selected as a
typical instance of the _ing_ patronymic in place-names.[43] If we
turn to Domesday, we find in Berks a ‘Ferendone,’ in Northants a
‘Ferendone’ or ‘Faredone,’ in Notts a ‘Ferendone’ or ‘Farendune,’ in
Hants a ‘Ferendone.’ These names were all the same; and yet they have
become ‘Farndon’ in Notts and Northants, ‘Faringdon’ in Berks, and
‘Farringdon’ in Hants. Farringdon, therefore, is no more a clan name
than is the Essex Parndon, the ‘Perenduna’ of Domesday. But, indeed, in
Essex itself, there is an even better illustration. We learn from Canon
Taylor that “the Thurings, a Visigothic clan, mentioned by Marcellinus
... are found ... at Thorrington in Essex.” Kemble had previously
described them as “likely to be offshoots of the great Hermunduric
race, the Thyringi or Thoringi, now Thuringians, always neighbours
of the Saxons,[44] and claims the Essex Thorrington” as their
settlement.[45] Now Thorington in the first place was not a _ton_, and
in the second place had not an _ing_. Both these forms are corruptions.
In Domesday it occurs twice, and both times as ‘Tor_induna_.’ With
this we may compare ‘Horn_induna_,’ which is the Domesday form of
Horndon, and occurs frequently. Therefore Thorington and Thorndon,
like Farringdon and Farndon, were both originally the same name and
destitute alike of _ing_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account