The Commune of London, and other studiesRound, John Horace
History
The Commune of London, and other studies
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; London (England) -- History -- To 1500
Let us first glance at the moated mound, and then at the rectangular
keep. I do not desire, on the moated mound, to commit myself to all
Mr. Clark’s views; but practical archæologists, I need scarcely say,
are aware that the outer works of these most interesting strongholds
were normally of horseshoe or crescent form, the mound being “placed
on one side of an appended area.”[107] Mr. Oman, while acknowledging
in his book, and in the columns of the ‘Athenæum,’ his indebtedness
to Mr. Clark’s “admirable account of the topographical details of
English castles,” describes the old English burhs as “stake and foss
in concentric rings enclosing water-girt mounds” (p. 111). I pointed
out in the ‘Athenæum’[108] that “Mr. Clark, who did more than any one
for our knowledge of these burhs, was careful to explain,” in his
plans,[109] that their outer defences were not concentric, as Mr. Oman
asserts.
Determined never to admit a mistake, Mr. Oman retorted:
Of course, I am quite aware that in many burhs the outer works
are not purely concentric; but the concentric form is the more
typical. An admirable example of such a stronghold may be
seen on p. 21 of Mr. Clark’s book, where he gives the plan of
Edward’s burh of Towcester built in 921.[110]
Yet, in dealing with the Norman shell keeps on these “old palisaded
mounds,” Mr. Oman actually, in his own book, admits, of their “outer
defences,” that
as a general rule, the keep lies _not in the middle of the
space_, but at one end of it, or set in the walls ... as a
general rule the keep stands at one end of the enclosed space,
_not in its midst_.[111]
This is the feature of these striking works for which I myself
contended, and which, on that account, Mr. Oman at once denied.
As to the Towcester burh, I will place side by side my criticism and
Mr. Oman’s reply:
MR. ROUND. MR. OMAN.
A comparison of the plan on p. 21 He states that Towcester
with those on pp. 24, 25 will show burh, as drawn on p. 21 of Mr.
at once that the former is that of Clark’s Mediæval Military
the “water-girt mound” (as Mr. Architecture, is ‘a water-girt
Oman terms it) alone, and contains mound alone, with no outer
no “outer works,” concentric or works, concentric or other.’...
other.[112] Apparently Mr. Round cannot
read the simplest military
sketch; in this map there are
clear indications of outer
lines other than the mere
water.... In short, Mr. Round
is writing nonsense, and I
strongly suspect that he
knows it.[113]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account