The Complete Testimony of the Fathers of the First Three Centuries Concerning the Sabbath and First DayAndrews, John Nevins
Religion
The Complete Testimony of the Fathers of the First Three Centuries Concerning the Sabbath and First Day
Andrews, John Nevins
Sabbath; Seventh-Day Adventists; Sunday
"We take also, in meetings before daybreak, and from the hand of
none but the presidents, the sacrament of the Eucharist, which the
Lord both commanded to be eaten at meal-times, and enjoined to be
taken by all [alike]. As often as the anniversary comes round, we
make offerings for the dead as birth-day honors. We count fasting
or kneeling in worship on the Lord's day to be unlawful. We rejoice
in the same privilege also from Easter to Whit-sunday. We feel
pained should any wine or bread, even though our own, be cast upon
the ground. At every forward step and movement, at every going in
and out, when we put on our clothes and shoes, when we bathe, when
we sit at table, when we light the lamps, on couch, on seat, in all
the ordinary actions of daily life, we trace upon the forehead the
sign [of the cross].
"If, for these and other such rules, you insist upon having
positive Scripture injunction, you will find none. Tradition will
be held forth to you as the originator of them, custom, as their
strengthener, and faith, as their observer. That reason will
support tradition, and custom, and faith, you will either yourself
perceive, or learn from some one who has."--_De Corona_, sects. 3
and 4.
The things which he counted unlawful on Sunday he expressly names.
These are fasting and kneeling on that day. But ordinary labor does
not come into his list of things unlawful on that day. And now observe
what progress apostasy and superstition had made in other things also.
"Offerings for the dead" were regularly made, and the sign of the cross
was repeated as often as God would have men rehearse his commandments.
See Deut. 6:6-9. And now if you wish to know Tertullian's authority
for the Sunday festival, offerings for the dead, and the sign of the
cross, he frankly tells you what it is. He had no authority from the
Scriptures. Custom and tradition were all that he could offer. Modern
divines can find plenty of authority, from the Scriptures, as they
assert, for maintaining the so-called Lord's day. Tertullian knew of
none. He took the Sunday festival, offerings for the dead, and the sign
of the cross, on the authority of custom and tradition; if you take the
first on such authority, why do you not, also, the other two?
But Tertullian finds it necessary to write a second defense of his
brethren from the charge of being sun-worshipers, a charge directly
connected with their observance of the festival of Sunday. Here are his
words:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account