The complete works of John Gower, volume 1 : $b The French worksGower, John
General
The complete works of John Gower, volume 1 : $b The French works
Gower, John
Poetry
(_a_) _ai_ before a nasal was in Anglo-Norman writing very commonly
represented by _ei_. This is merely a question of spelling apparently,
the sound designated being the same in either case. Our author (or his
scribe) had a certain preference for uniformity of appearance in each
set of rhymes. Thus he gives us first _solein_, _plein_, _soverein_,
_certein_, _mein_, _Evein_, in _Mir._ 73 ff., then _vain_, _grain_,
_main_, _gain_, _pain_, _vilain_, 2199 ff.; or again _haltaines_,
_paines_, _acompaines_, _compaines_, _restraines_, _certaines_, 603
ff., but _peine_, _constreine_, _vileine_, _peine_ (verb), _aleine_,
_procheine_, 2029 ff. Sometimes however the two forms of spelling are
intermixed, as _vein_, _pain_, _main_, &c., 16467 ff., or _meine_,
_humeine_, _capitaine_, 759 ff. Some of the words in the _ai_ series,
as _pain_, _gain_, _compaine_, are spelt with _ai_ only, but there
are rhyme-sequences in _-ain_ without any of these words included, as
6591 ff., _main_, _prochain_, _vilain_, _certain_, _vain_, _sain_;
also words with original French _ei_, such as _peine_, _constreine_,
_restreines_, _enseigne_, _plein_ (plenus), _veine_ (vena), _meinz_
(minus), _atteins_, _feinte_, _exteinte_, enter into the same class.
Thus we must conclude that before a nasal these two diphthongs were
completely confused. It must be noted that the liquid sound of the
nasal in such words as _enseigne_, _plaigne_, had been completely lost,
but the letter _g_ with which it was associated in French continued
to be very generally written, and by the influence of these words _g_
was often introduced without justification into others. Thus we have
the rhymes _ordeigne_, _meine_, _semeigne_ (= _semaine_), _desdeigne_,
_peine_, 2318 ff.; _peigne_ (= _peine_), _compleigne_, _pleine_,
_meine_, _halteigne_, _atteigne_, in _Bal._ iii; while in _gaign_,
_bargaign_, rhyming with _grain_, _prochain_, &c., _g_ is omitted
at pleasure. Evidently in the Anglo-Norman of this period it had no
phonetic value.
(_b_) When not before a nasal, _ai_ and _ei_ do not interchange freely
in this manner. Before _l_, _ll_, it is true, _ei_ has a tendency to
become _ai_, as in _conseil consail_ (also _consal_), _consei(l)ler
consail(l)er_, _merveille mervaille_; also we have _contrefeite_,
_souffreite_, 6305 ff., _eie_ for _aie_ (_avoir_), _eir_ for _air_
13867, _gleyve_ 14072, _meistre_ 24714, _eide_ (_eyde_) for _aide_
in the rubric headings, _paleis_ (_palois_) for _palais_, and _vois_
(representing _veis_) sometimes for _vais_ (vado); also in ante-tonic
syllables, _cheitif_, _eiant_, _eysil_, _leiter_, _meisoun_,
_meistrie_, _oreisoun_, _peisible_, _pleisir_, _seisine_, _veneisoun_,
beside _chaitif_, _allaiter_, _maisoun_, _maistrie_, _paisible_,
_plaisir_, _saisine_. This change is much less frequent, especially
in tonic syllables, than in some earlier texts, e.g. the _Vie de S.
Grégoire_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account