The complete works of John Gower, volume 4 : $b The Latin works — John Shaqi
The complete works of John Gower, volume 4 : $b The Latin worksGower, John
General
The complete works of John Gower, volume 4 : $b The Latin works
Gower, John
Poetry
Stow, writing about 1598, says, ‘This church was again newly rebuilt
in the reign of Richard II and king Henry IV. John Gower, a learned
gentleman and a famous poet, but no knight, as some have mistaken it,
was then an especial benefactor to that work, and was there buried in
the north side of the said church, in the chapel of St. John, where
he founded a chantry. He lieth under a tomb of stone with his image
also of stone being over him. The hair of his head brown, long to his
shoulders but curling up, collar of esses of gold about his neck;
under his head,’ &c.[51] The tomb is then further described as by
Berthelette, with addition of the epitaph in four Latin hexameters,
‘Armigeri scutum,’ &c. (see p. 367 of this volume).
In the _Annals of England_ (date about 1600) he again describes the
tomb, adding to his description of the painting of the three virgins
the important note, ‘All which is now washed out and the image defaced
by cutting off the nose and striking off the hands[52],’ from which it
would appear that we cannot depend even upon the features of the effigy
which now exists, as original.
The figures of the virgins were repainted in the course of the
seventeenth century apparently, for in Hatton’s _New View of London_
(date 1708) they are described as appearing with ‘ducal coronets[53].’
In Rawlinson’s _Natural History and Antiquities of Surrey_ (published
1719) the effigy is spoken of as having a ‘scarlet gown,’ the older
descriptions, e.g. Stow, giving it as ‘an habit of purple damasked,’
and it is said that there is upon the head ‘a chaplet or diadem of gold
about an inch broad, on which are set at equal distances four white
quaterfoyles.’[54] The writer argues also that the chain should be of
silver rather than of gold[55]. The arms are said to be ‘supported by
two angels,’ and ‘underneath is this inscription, “Hic iacet Iohannes
Gower Armiger Anglorum poeta celeberrimus ac huic sacro Edificio
Benefactor insignis temporibus Edw. III et Ric. II. Armigeri scutum,”’
&c. The following remark is added: ‘Our author Mr. John Aubrey gives
us an inscription which he says he saw on a limb of this monument,
something different from the foregoing, and therefore not unworthy a
place here, viz.
Johannes Gower, Princeps
Poetarum Angliae, vixit
temporibus Edwardi tertii
et Richardi secundi.’
Later, in 1765, Tyler describes the gown as purple and the arms as
pendent by the dexter corner. The figures of women have ducal coronets
and scrolls of gold, and below them is the epitaph ‘Armigeri scutum.’
Under the statue the inscription ‘Hic iacet,’ &c.[56] The monument, as
here described, is engraved in Gough’s _Sepulchral Monuments_ (date
1796), where there is a full description of it[57]. Blore, under whose
direction the position of the monument was changed, says in 1826 that
the inscription on the ledge of the tomb ‘Hic iacet,’ &c., was then
entirely gone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account