The Conflict of Religions in the Early Roman EmpireGlover, T. R. (Terrot Reaveley)
Religion
The Conflict of Religions in the Early Roman Empire
Glover, T. R. (Terrot Reaveley)
Christianity and other religions; Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Rome -- Religion
The Christian conception of the "descent of God" is repulsive to
Celsus, for it means contact with matter. "God's anger," too, is an
impious idea, for anger is a passion; and {247} Celsus makes havoc of
the Old Testament passages where God is spoken of as having human
passions (_anthropopathes_), closing with an _argumentum ad
hominem_--"Is it not absurd that a man [Titus], angry with the Jews,
slew all their youth and burnt their land, and so they came to nothing;
but God Almighty, as they say, angry and vexed and threatening, sends
his son and endures such things as they tell?"[29] Furthermore, the
Christian account of God's anger at man's sin involves a presumption
that Christians really know what evil is. "Now the origin of evil is
not to be easily known by one who has no philosophy. It is enough to
tell the common people that evil is not from God, but is inherent in
matter, and is a fellow-citizen (_empoliteuetai_) of mortality. The
circuit of mortal things is from beginning to end the same, and in the
appointed circles the same must always of necessity have been and be
and be again."[30] "Nor could the good or evil elements in mortal
things become either less or greater. God does not need to restore all
things anew. God is not like a man, that, because he has faultily
contrived or executed without skill, he should try to amend the
world."[31] In short, "even if a thing seems to you to be bad, it is
not yet clear that it is bad; for you do not know what is of advantage
to yourself, or to another, or to the whole."[32] Besides would God
need to descend in order to {248} learn what was going on among
men?[33] Or was he dissatisfied with the attention he received, and
did he really come down to show off like a _nouveau riche_ (_oi
neoploutoi_)?"[34] Then why not long before?[35]
Should Christians ask him how God is to be seen, he has his answer: "If
you will be blind to sense and see with the mind, if you will turn from
the flesh and waken the eyes of the soul, thus and thus only shall you
see God."[36] In words that Origen approves, he says, "from God we
must never and in no way depart, neither by day nor by night, in public
or in private, in every word and work perpetually, but, with these and
without, let the soul ever be strained towards God."[37] "If any man
bid you, in the worship of God, either to do impiety, or to say
anything base, you must never be persuaded by him. Rather endure every
torture and submit to every death, than think anything unholy of God,
let alone say it."[38]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account