The Conflict of Religions in the Early Roman EmpireGlover, T. R. (Terrot Reaveley)
Religion
The Conflict of Religions in the Early Roman Empire
Glover, T. R. (Terrot Reaveley)
Christianity and other religions; Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Rome -- Religion
[99] Cf. Tert. _de cor. mil._ 11, if a soldier is converted, _aut
deserendum statim ut a multis actum, aut,_ etc. The chapter is a
general discussion whether military service and Christianity are
compatible. Cf. also Tert. _de idol._ 19, _Non convenit sacramento
divino et humano, signo Christi et signo diaboli, castris lucis et
castris tenebrarum ... quomodo autem bellabit immo quomodo etiam in
pace militabit sine gladio quem dominus abstulit? .... omnem postea
militem dominus in Petro exarmando discinxit_. Tertullian, it may be
remembered, was a soldier's son.
[100] viii, 68. The Greeks used _basileus_ as Emperor.
[101] viii, 69. For this taunt against the Jews, cf. Cicero, _pro
Flacco_, 28, 69.
[102] viii, 72.
[103] viii, 73.
[104] viii, 75.
[105] Cf. Clem. Alex. _Strom._ i, 55, who says that hardly any words
could be to the many more absurd than the mysteries of the faith.
[106] Clem. Alex. _Protr._ 56 (on idols). _ou gar moi themis
empisteusai pote tois apsychois tas tes psyches elpidas_.
[107] This was at all events the view of Clement, _Strom._ i, 19.
_oude katapsephixesthai ton Hellenon oion te psile te peri ton
dogmatiothenton autois chromenous phrasei, me synembrainontas eis ten
kata meros achri syllnoseos ekkalypsin. pistos gar eu mala ho met'
empeirias elegchos, hoti kai teleiotate apadeixis ehurisketai he gnosis
ton kategnosmenon_.
[108] It is regrettable that Clement should have flung one of these
against the school of Carpocrates, _Strom._ iii, 10.
{262}
CHAPTER IX
CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA
Viderint qui Stoicum et Platonicum et dialecticum Christianismum
protulerunt.--TERTULLIAN, _de praescr. haeret._ 7.
No one can allege that the Bible has failed to win access for want of
metaphysics being applied to it.--MATTHEW ARNOLD, _Literature and
Dogma_, p. 121.
Though Celsus had much to say upon the vulgar and servile character of
the members of the Christian community, he took the trouble to write a
book to refute Christianity; and this book, as we have seen, was
written from a more or less philosophical point of view. He professed
himself doubtful as to whether his opponents would understand his
arguments; but that he wrote at all, and that he wrote as he did, is
evidence that the new faith was making its way upward through society,
and was gaining a hold upon the classes of wealth and education.
[Sidenote: The rise of the Church]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account