The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 5, May 1860)Various
General
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 5, May 1860)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
How pleasant it was, too, that one bishop should be getting fifteen
thousand a year and another with an equal cure of parsons only four! That
a certain prelate could get twenty thousand one year and his successor in
the same diocese only five the next! There was something in it pleasant,
and picturesque; it was an arrangement endowed with feudal charms,
and the change which they have made was distasteful to many of us. A
bishop with a regular salary, and no appanage of land and land-bailiffs,
is only half a bishop. Let any man prove to me the contrary ever so
thoroughly—let me prove it to my own self ever so often, my heart in
this matter is not thereby a whit altered. One liked to know that there
was a dean or two who got his three thousand a year, and that old Dr.
Purple held four stalls, one of which was golden, and the other three
silver-gilt! Such knowledge was always pleasant to me! A golden stall!
How sweet is the sound thereof to church-loving ears!
But bishops have been shorn of their beauty, and deans are in their
decadence. A utilitarian age requires the fatness of the ecclesiastical
land, in order that it may be divided out into small portions of
provender, on which necessary working clergymen may live,—into portions
so infinitesimally small that working clergymen can hardly live.
And the full-blown rectors and vicars, with full-blown tithes—with
tithes when too full-blown for strict utilitarian principles—will
necessarily follow. Stanhope and Doddington must bow their heads,
with such compensation for temporal rights as may be extracted,—but
probably without such compensation as may be desired. In other trades,
professions, and lines of life, men are paid according to their work.
Let it be so in the Church. Such will sooner or later be the edict of a
utilitarian, reforming, matter-of-fact House of Parliament.
I have a scheme of my own on the subject, which I will not introduce
here, seeing that neither men nor women would read it. And with reference
to this matter, I will only here further explain that all these words
have been brought about by the fact, necessary to be here stated,
that Mr. Crawley only received one hundred and thirty pounds a year
for performing the whole parochial duty of the parish of Hogglestock.
And Hogglestock is a large parish. It includes two populous villages,
abounding in brickmakers, a race of men very troublesome to a zealous
parson who won’t let men go rollicking to the devil without interference.
Hogglestock has full work for two men; and yet all the funds therein
applicable to parson’s work is this miserable stipend of one hundred
and thirty pounds a year. It is a stipend neither picturesque, nor
time-honoured, nor feudal, for Hogglestock takes rank only as a perpetual
curacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account