The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 250 new series, April 1917)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 250 new series, April 1917)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
There is a want of the proper spirit; if a nation would flourish
(politically speaking) there must be a desire in the breast of each man
of something more than merely to live—he must desire to live well; and if
men cannot live well at home they will go and live well elsewhere. The
condition upon which a country circumstanced as ours is exists, is that
it should become the Mother of Empires, and this Mr. W. Horton feels, but
his plans are not extensive or universal enough. I had a conversation
with him, but could not make him enter into my views. We ought to send
out colonies, but not privately or by parishes; it should be a grand
National concern; there should be in every family one or more brought up
for this and this alone.
A Father should say, ‘There, John now is a fine strong fellow and an
enterprising lad, he shall be a colonist.’
But then some fool-like Lord ⸺ gets up and tells us ‘Oh no! America
should be a warning.’
Good Heavens, Sir! a warning, and of what? Are we to beware of having 2
[sets?] of men bound to us by the ties of allegiance and of affinity; 2
[sets] of men in a distant part of the world speaking the language of
Shakspear and Milton, and living under the laws of Alfred. But a warning
they should be to us, to give freely and in good time that liberty which
is their due, and which they will properly extort from us if we withhold.
_F._ Is it not moreover true, Sir, that we should show ourselves really
a Mother and not a Stepmother to those Empires which we found? We should
with a nursing hand lead them through the dangers of infancy; but why
keep them in leading strings when they are able to act for themselves?
We should relax our hold by slow degrees as they are able to bear it,
and nurture them to be free and manly states, and not the slaves of
any, still less of their own Mother. What Mother ever complains of the
ingratitude of her Son because he does not follow at her apron-strings
all the days of his life? Why then do we complain of America, who
with greater justice might complain of us that we have been far from
remembering one great duty, namely that a Mother if need be should even
sacrifice herself for her child?
_C._ What you say is very true; but with regard to the execution of a
plan of Colonisation, why should we not make the absurd system of Poor
Laws subservient to the measure?
Why not, since as Sir N. T.[2] told Bartle the other day, An offer and
refusal is as good as an acceptance, propose to any person requiring
assistance of the overseer the following terms:—We have it is true bound
ourselves by a most foolish promise to find you work; we have none here,
but if you choose to go out to the Swan River, you shall have as much as
you want, and we will carry you out there, your wife and your children
too, if you have them, and you shall get your livelihood in an honorable
and independent way—and mind you are now to consider us discharged of our
promise to find you work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account