The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 250 new series, April 1917)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 250 new series, April 1917)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
_F._ It is true that this would be fair enough, but as long as the poor
man sees the rich enjoy a liberty which he does not, viz. that of living
in the land in which he was born, he would complain, and not without
reason. Let then the young and active in the higher ranks set them the
example. And why should the unlearned be deprived of the countenance
and assistance of the wiser? What can hand do without head, especially
in untamed countries? Heaven knows the labouring classes have been most
iniquitously considered for some time and are now becoming, as Mr.
Coleridge says, more things than persons, and are therefore more than
ever unfit to be sent alone.
_C._ And therefore the younger sons of noblemen and the fops of town
would have been employed in a manner much better for their country, and
more happy for themselves had they been brought up as members and limbs
of a colony instead of thrusting themselves into situations to which they
do not naturally belong, and to the exclusion of all competition, or
wasting their energies at Newmarket or in Crockfords.
* * * * *
_C._ Almost all thinking Jews are Deists. I wonder Mr. ⸺ should ever have
talked with you on those subjects; the persecution which a Jew would
undergo from his brethren if it was known that he did so, is not to be
calculated. The life, you know, of Spinoza was twice attempted, but he
professed Christianity, at least in his way in a letter to a friend;
for he said that if the Logos could be manifested in the flesh, it must
converse and act as Jesus did. At the same time his notions of a God were
very Pantheistic, a ⊙le. whose centre is everywhere and circumference
nowhere. He had no notion of a Conscious Being of a God—but with these
ideas to talk of God becoming flesh appears to me very much like talking
of a square ⊙le.
Spinoza is a man whom I most deeply reverence, I was going to say whom
I reverence as much as it is possible for me to reverence any creature.
He was on the borders of the truth, and would no doubt had he lived have
attained it.
But bless me! to talk of converting the Jews, people are not aware of
what they undertake.
Mr. ⸺ say’d to me, and I thought very beautifully, ‘Convert the Jews!
Alas, Sir, Mammon and Ignorance are the two giant porters who stand at
the gates of Jerusalem and forbid the entrance of Truth.’
* * * * *
_F._ You have not read much of Keats, Sir, I think.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account