The scales are much less than those of the other species, as deep as
they are broad, and resembling in general form the scales of the H.
Murchisoni found in Clashbennie. What peculiarly distinguishes them is
the figure of the ornaments (_le dessin des ornemens_) of the surface,
which are parallel, horizontal, very marked and distant in the A. and
never extending in the striæ to the posterior edge. The scales, again, of
H. Flemingii are on the sides of the fish deeper than they are broad, and
on the belly they become rounder. Their ornaments are also very distinct
in the F., consisting of a system of waving lines, which run horizontally
toward the outer edge without any perceptible ramification, while the
wrinkles of the scale rise from a series of little hills (_collines_)
ranged parallel over the length of the inner edge, undulating and very
close. This specimen is represented as very imperfect. The other is
nearly entire, the plates of the head and several of the teeth are well
preserved, every scale is in its place, and the fins are only wanting to
restore the normal outline of the fish. This fossil has been figured and
erroneously described in the author’s “Geology of the County of Fife”
under the name of gyrolepis (holoptychius now) giganteus, from which,
says M. Agassiz, it differs specifically.
From the fossils of this locality has been established the new genus of
GLYPTOPOMUS, the specimen of which being originally mistaken by Agassiz
for a platygnathus, but since found by him to differ from that genus in
several material points. The scales of the platygnathus, for example, are
round and imbricated, possessing in this respect all the characteristics
of the scales of the cœlacanthes, while on the other hand those of the
glyptopomus resemble the scales of the sauroids, which are rhomboidal or
square (_ou carrées_), closely set and never imbricated, as shown in the
subjoined illustration.
[Illustration: Glyptopomus Minor.]
Moreover, the platygnathes are lengthy (_allongés_) in the body, likewise
long (_longue_) in the tail, which is furnished with a very strong
fin, whereas the body of the glyptopomes is very thick, and the tail
short. The ornaments of the scales of G. bear a close affinity to those
generally of the cœlacanthes. Only one species as yet has been found, the
glytopomus minor, and figured in the tab. 26 of the “Monograph” under the
name of platygnathus minor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account