The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
But while science as such, in strict obedience to its canons, must stop
at the self-adjustment of immediate phenomena, and materialism will
stop there, the reasoning faculties of the race, as we have seen, will
not stop there. They must come at last, by the laws of reason, upon
the power and the intelligence by which the methods of nature were
made self-acting. Gravitation and the properties of water will account
for the perfect adaptation of the river to its bed, and the bed to
the purpose of a river. But how came gravity? How came the properties
of water? There may be, there is, no direct design in the path of the
Amazon or the Danube; but surely there is magnificence in the design
that caused the great, the cosmic _methods_ of nature so to co-operate
as to cause those rivers inevitably to carve their perfect paths? The
dynamics of nature are self-acting up to the very limit of our power of
research; but after that, and beyond it, what? Why is the _direction_
of nature’s dynamical methods always and everywhere, through all time
and space, beneficent and beautiful?
It is only the design, the teleology, of the old school, touched by the
Ithuriel spear of modern knowledge, and changing into a conception of
universal design, that can only have originated in an infinite mind.
The ‘law of evolution’ and that of ‘variation and the survival of the
fittest’ may, if you will, be held to account for all that narrower
knowledge had attributed to direct design. But evolution, like
gravitation, is only a method; and the self-adjustments demonstrated
in the ‘origin of species’ only make it, to reason, the clearer, that
variation and survival is a method that took its origin in mind. It is
true that the egg of a moth, and the eye of a dogfish, and the forearm
of a tiger _must_ be what they are to accomplish the end of their
being. But that only shows, as we shade our mental eyes, and gaze back
to the beginning, the magnificence of the design that was _in_volved in
nature’s beginning, so as to be _e_volved, by the designed rhythm of
nature’s methods.
Whatever matter may be; whatever force is; or whether or not both
are the one inseverable product of omnipotent volition; the first
affection of matter by force carried with it, potentially, the finished
purpose of the All-wise, whatever that may be. Every instance of what
such writers as Darwin are obliged to write of as ‘contrivance’ or
‘adaptation’ throughout this universe as it now is, or that shall yet
arise in it through all duration, are, and will be, but factors of
related harmony in a stupendously vast interlocked ‘mosaic’ of design,
which in its entirety has a ‘final purpose’ too great for man to see.
It is admitted by the fullest and farthest thinkers, that the
teleological, and the mechanical views, of phenomena and their origin,
are not antagonistic. Instead of mutually excluding each other in
thought, they are the complement of each other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account