The Crisis of Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-One in the Government of the United States.: Its Cause, and How It Should Be MetStreight, Abel D.
History
The Crisis of Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-One in the Government of the United States.: Its Cause, and How It Should Be Met
Streight, Abel D.
Secession; United States -- Politics and government -- 1857-1861
"A distinction, more subtle than accurate, has been raised between a
_confederacy_ and a _consolidation_ of the States. The essential
characteristic of the first, is said to be the restriction of its
authority to the members in their collective capacities, without
reaching to the individuals of whom they are composed. It is contended
that the national council ought to have no concern with any object of
internal administration. An exact equality of suffrage between the
members, has also been insisted upon as a leading feature of a
confederate government. These positions are, in the main, arbitrary;
they are supported neither by principle nor precedent. It has indeed
happened, that governments of this kind have generally operated in the
manner which the distinction taken notice of supposes to be inherent
in their nature; but there have been in most of them extensive
exceptions to the practice, which serve to prove, as far as example
will go, that there is no absolute rule on the subject. And it will be
clearly shown, in the course of this investigation, that, as far as
the principle contended for has prevailed, it has been the cause of
incurable disorder and imbecility in the government.
"The definition of a _confederate republic_ seems simply to be 'an
assemblage of societies,' or an association of two or more States into
one State. The extent, modifications, and objects of the federal
authority are mere matters of discretion. So long as the separate
organization of the members be not abolished, so long as it exists by
a constitutional necessity for local purposes, though it should be in
perfect subordination to the general authority of the Union, it would
still be, in fact and theory, an association of States, or a
confederacy The proposed constitution, so far from implying an
abolition of the State government, makes them constituent parts of the
national sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the
senate, and leaves in their possession certain exclusive, and very
important, portions of the sovereign power. This fully corresponds, in
every rational import of the terms, with the idea of a federal
government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account