High in Low in
1901-1902 1903
Amalgamated 130 33⅝
Am. Smelter 69 36¾
Am. Sugar 153 107⅛
Anaconda 54¼ 25½
Col. F. & I. 136½ 24
Nat’l Lead 32 10½
Tenn. Coal & I. 76⅝ 25⅞
U. S. Rubber 34 7
U. S. Steel 55 10
U. S. Steel, Pfd. 101⅞ 49¾
------- -------
Average price 84.22 33.01
“It will be observed from the above table that Industrials declined
about 51 points while rails declined about 48 points. But the decline
cannot be figured in points. The higher range of railroad shares must
be considered. A decline of two points in a stock selling at 100 is
only equivalent to a decline of one point in a stock selling at 50.
Therefore, in order to get a correct view of the matter, we must reduce
the decline to percentages. On this basis, railroad stocks lost about
38% of their value, and industrial stocks lost about 60% of their
value.”--From Thomas Gibson’s Market Letter, May 4th, 1907.
_Undigested Securities._
“The new methods and the new projects are going through the test of
fire today, and some of them are being consumed. The tests which weeded
out the badly organized and incompetent of the early stock companies,
which drove to the wall the “wildcat” banks of ante-bellum days, and
which wiped out dividends and stock rights in badly managed railways,
are now being applied to the new forms of organization which have been
the growth of the past decade. But the stronger and better organized
of these new corporations are likely to meet these trials without
disaster, or to modify their methods to conform to the teachings of
experience, until there remains to the financial world a valuable
residuum of new methods for giving flexibility to capital and promoting
its transfer promptly and efficiently from the industries where it is
not needed to those where it will render its highest service.”--From
“Wall Street and the Country,” by Chas. A. Conant.
_How to Compute the Value of Rights._
“Inasmuch as the method of computing the value of rights is slightly
complicated, an illustration may be given. Let us take the instance
of St. Paul again, where the stockholders were allowed to subscribe
to 23% of their holdings to new stock at par. The common stock was at
that time selling a little below $200 per share. Let us take the round
figure, and the operation is as follows:
One hundred shares at $200 per share equals $20,000
Twenty-three shares at $100 equals 2,300
-------
Total cost of 123 shares $22,300
“Average cost, $181 per share.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account