The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 1 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Religion
The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 1 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Iran -- Religion; Religions
animals, and these are not shedders of blood: and if such an act
should be inadvertently perpetrated by any individuals, destructive
animals are then appointed to retaliate on them, as we have explained
under the head of the ox.
The best mode to be adopted by merciful men for putting to death
destructive creatures, such as fowls, sparrows, and the like, is the
following: let them open a vein, so that it may die from the effusion
of blood: there are many precepts of this kind recorded in the _Jashen
Sudah_ of the _Móbed Hoshyár_: but philosophers, eminent doctors, and
durveshes who abandon the world, never commit such acts: it is however
indispensably necessary that a king, in the course of government,
should inflict on the evildoer the retaliation due to his conduct. The
Móbed _Hoshyár_ relates, in the _Sarud-i-Mastán_, that in the time of
Kaíomors and Siamak, no animal of any kind was slain, as they were all
obedient to the commands of these princes. So that one of the
_Farjúd_, or miraculous powers possessed by the Yezdanian chiefs of
Iran, from Kaíomors to Jemshíd, was their appointing a certain class
of officers to watch over the animal creation, so that they should not
attack each other. For instance, a lion was not permitted to destroy
any animal, and if he killed one in the chase, he met with due
punishment; consequently no creature was slain or destroyed, and
carnage fell into such disuse among noxious animals, that they were
all reckoned among the innoxious. However, the skins of animals which
had died a natural death were taken off, and in the beginning used as
clothing by Kaíomors and his subjects: but they were latterly
satisfied with the leaves of trees. Those who embrace the tenets of
this holy race attribute this result to the miraculous powers of these
monarchs, and some profound thinkers regard it as effected by a
_talisman_; whilst many skilled in interpretation hold it to be an
enigmatical mode of expression: thus, the animal creation submitting
to government implies, the justice of the sovereigns; their vigilance
in extirpating corruption and evil, and producing good. In short, when
in the course of succession the Gilsháíyán crown came to Húshang, he
enjoined the people to eat the superabundant eggs of ducks, domestic
fowls, and such like, but not to such a degree that, through their
partaking of such food, the race of these creatures should become
extinct. When the throne of sovereignty was adorned by the presence of
Tahmúras, he said, “It is lawful for carnivorous and noxious creatures
to eat dead bodies:” that is, if a lion find a lifeless stag, or a
sparrow a dead worm, they may partake of them. In the same manner,
when Jemshid assumed the crown, he enacted: “If men of low caste eat
the flesh of animals which die a natural death, they commit no sin.”
The reason why people do not at present eat of animals which died in
the course of nature, is, that their flesh engenders disease, as the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account