The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 1 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Religion
The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 1 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Iran -- Religion; Religions
According to this sect there are seven worlds: the first is absolute
existence and pure being, which they call _Arang_[315] or “divinity;”
the second is the world of intelligences, which they call _Birang_ or
“the empyreal;” the third is that of souls, called _Alrang_ or the
angelic; the fourth that of the superior bodies, or _Nirang_; the
fifth, the elementary or _Rang_; the sixth the compounds of the four
elements, or _Rang-a-Rang_: but according to the Sufís all bodies,
whether superior or inferior, are named _Málk_ or region; the seventh
is _Sarang_, which is that of man or of human beings: but in some
Parsi treatises they term these seven regions the seven true
realities: however, if the author were to describe minutely the
articles and ceremonies of this sect, their details would require so
many volumes, that contenting himself with what has been stated, he
now proceeds to describe some of their most distinguished followers of
later times.
[228] Here begins the translation of David Shea.
[229] _Serúsh_ or _Serósh_, is derived from the Zend, and
signifies properly _sí-roz_, that is “thirty days, a month.”
To the adorers of the stars, Serósh is the name of an angel
who presides over the 17th day of the month; according to
their religion, he is moreover the most active of the
celestial spirits; as king of the earth, he passes every day
and every night three times through his empire; his throne
is the summit of the world; all light, all intelligence, he
purifies and fertilizes the earth, blesses and protects
mankind, strikes the evil spirits; in short, he is adored
equal to the supreme being. (_See Zend Avesta, par Anquetil
du Perron_, _I._ 2. P. _pp._ 80, 156, 228, 404, 415; _II._
320, 330, 223, 235, 237).――A. T.
[230] The text given by Gladwin (_see the New Asiatic
Miscellany_, _vol. I. p._ 93), and the manuscript of Oude,
have no negative before خجسته; the sense would
therefore be: “if his words had been plausible, but the
deeds bad.” The edit. of Calcutta gives the sense as
above.――A. T.
[231] Gladwin translates this passage as follows (_ibid._,
_p._ 94): “If a deserving soul produces good words and
deeds,” which is in accordance with the text he followed,
and with that of the edit. of Calcutta; but Shea’s
translation is justified by the manuscript of Oude, which
has: بي پسنديده اقوال فرّخی افعال.――A. T.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account