The Daguerreian Journal, Vol. I, No. 8, March 1, 1851Various
Science
The Daguerreian Journal, Vol. I, No. 8, March 1, 1851
Various
Daguerreotype; Photography -- Periodicals
Let us see if we also cannot get up some astonishing statistics: The
regular subscribers to the _New York Tribune_, standing in single file,
each holding fast to the other's coat-tail, would form a line 176 miles,
7 rods and one yard long. Allowing that each could hop, skip and jump the
distance of 4 yards, their simultaneous performance of this feat would
extend from Cape Horn to Baffins Bay. Supposing they all sneezed at once,
the vibration of the air would overthrow the spire of Trinity Church. In
reading the 48 columns of our double sheet every morning, the distance
travelled by their eyes would reach twice round the earth. There! Is that
enough?--_Tribune._
Wonder if the Tribune's calculations is made from the actual measurement
of the "tail" of the "old white coat?" If so its not fair, for Horace has
the advantage over the modern fashion.
* * * * *
Strange Announcement.--We see by a Georgia exchange, that some one in that
State is taking "Daguerreotypes as low as seventy-five cents." Our Devil
says "Barnum is after the _wonder_, and intends having him early this
Spring."
* * * * *
EXAMPLES OF THE DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER.
All that has been written in support of what is termed the "Infinite
Divisibility of Matter," has been advanced with an oversight of certain
axiomatic principles which immediately decide the question in the
negative. Indeed, it would suffice to say that there can be no such thing
as a division of matter into an infinite number of parts simply because
there can be no such thing as an infinite number of any thing. Number
is essentially finite, and although, in imagination, it can be extended
indefinitely, it never can be positively infinite, at any period of
futurity, from the very fact that we can always conceive of its being
extended still farther. Even as an ideal extension of parts, it has always
a beginning and an end, at any given time we may assume for measuring
it, and is, therefore, never infinite in itself at any time. In this
respect it differs essentially from infinite space, which having no parts,
is positively infinite at all times. Number is a convenient instrument
wherewith to obtain an idea of infinite space, or of infinite duration,
on account of its capacity for endless extension or continuation; and it
is because we can ideally extend and continue it forever, without even
approximating to a measurement of space and duration, that we discover
the latter to be absolutely infinite, and number to be absolutely
finite. We discover that between the capacity for endless extension and
endless extension itself, there is a manifest and decided difference.
Under any circumstances, therefore, the term infinite, as applied to
the divisibility of matter, is unphilosophical and improper. All the
matter in the universe is finite, and if it were to be doubled, or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account