The danger of premature interment : $b Proved from many remarkable instances of people who have recovered after being laid out for dead, and of others entombed alive, for want of being properly examined prior to intermentTaylor, Joseph
History
The danger of premature interment : $b Proved from many remarkable instances of people who have recovered after being laid out for dead, and of others entombed alive, for want of being properly examined prior to interment
Taylor, Joseph
Burial, Premature; Funeral rites and ceremonies
It is to be feared that the ancients had juster and more rational
ideas, relative to the disposal of the dead, than the moderns seem in
general to possess. The cemeteries in populous and crowded cities are,
for the most part, not only offensive, but destructive, and engender
diseases. Quiet, remote, and unfrequented places, if properly secured,
are certainly the most suitable for the purposes of interment. The
practice of burying in churches, or near them, has not the least
foundation in holy writ; on the contrary, we know, that under the
Mosaic dispensation, the bodies of the dead were considered as a
pollution to the priest and the altar; and the custom which prevails at
present, was introduced by the Romish clergy, who pretended that the
defunct enjoyed great and peculiar privileges by having their remains
deposited in consecrated ground.
The Germans have begun to remove the burying-place a mile or two from
every city or town, by which means they have abolished, or paved the
way towards abolishing, all the nonsensical epitaphs and laughable
inscriptions, which generally abound in church-yards, and too often
disgrace the memory they mean to celebrate; and have substituted for
the offensive cemetery an agreeable kind of garden, more calculated to
inspire calm devotions than sentiments of horror.
_Vide Render’s Tour through Germany._
* * * * *
In the voyages and travels of Dr. Hasselquist, a Swedish physician, he
observes, concerning burials in churches and towns: “The burying places
of the Turks are handsome and agreeable, which is owing chiefly to the
many fine plants that grow in them, and which they carefully place over
their dead. The Turks are much more consistent than the Christians,
when they bury their dead without the town, and plant over them such
vegetables as by their aromatic smell can drive away the fatal odours
with which the air is filled in such places. I am persuaded that
by this they escape many misfortunes which affect Christians from
wandering and dwelling continually among the dead.”
* * * * *
The great Sir Matthew Hale was always very much against burying in
churches, and used to say, “_that churches were for the living, and the
church-yards for the dead_.” He himself was interred in the church-yard
of Alderley, in Gloucestershire.
* * * * *
In Mold church, in Flintshire, is an epitaph on Dr. William Wynne,
written by himself; in which are these words:
In conformity to an ancient usage,
From a proper regard to decency,
And a concern for the health
of his fellow-creatures,
He was moved to give particular directions for being buried in the
adjoining church-yard,
“and not in the church.”
* * * * *
In 1776, The king of France prohibited the burying in churches.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account