THE DANUBE [Illustration: WEITENEGG CASTLE FROM THE WEITENBACH] THE DANUBE BY WALTER JERROLD WITH THIRTY ILLUSTRATIONS BY LOUIS WEIRTER, R.B.A. OF WHICH TWELVE ARE IN COLOUR METHUEN & CO. LTD. 36 ESSEX STREET W.C. LONDON _First Published in 1911_ PREFACE The Rhine appears to have been one of the earliest of Continental “playgrounds” for British tourists--to have been such, indeed, long before Switzerland had been exploited. In the days of our grandfathers “everybody” went to the Rhine--it had become as it were the last relic of the grand tour which to earlier generations had been regarded as a necessary finishing off to every gentleman’s education. The past popularity of the Rhine is emphasized by the fact that the great river was utilized by both Thackeray and Hood as scenic background for literary purposes. What the Rhine was, the greater, the more beautiful, the grander and more fascinating Danube should become in these days of improved means of communication. Probably in the past its difficulty of access made the enthusiasm of travellers less effective in attracting English visitors to the Danube. As early as 1827, J. R. Planché, poet, dramatist, and historian of costume, made a _Descent of the Danube from Ratisbon to Vienna_, and duly published an account of the journey in the following year. Twenty years later another writer, who had “scribbled successfully for the stage,” John Palgrave Simpson, published _Letters from the Danube_, describing a journey by steamer from Ratisbon to Budapest. Then, in 1853, “two briefless barristers and a Cambridge undergraduate” journeyed in a Thames rowing-boat from Kelheim to Budapest, and one of their number, R. B. Mansfield, chronicled their adventures in _The Water Lily on the Danube: being a brief account of a Pair-Oar during a voyage from Lambeth to Pesth_. Some years earlier William Beattie had gathered various legends of the Danube to accompany Bartlett’s series of engravings of _The Beauties of the Danube_. Thus it will be seen that in days when the river was more distant than it is now it was not wanting panegyrists. In later years it has been curiously neglected, except in the way of casual references and the compact compilations of guide-books. This, however, may be said, so far as I have been able to ascertain, nobody who has journeyed along both the Rhine and the Danube--if we except the pardonable partiality of those who have a patriotic regard for the former--but finds the Danube almost incomparably the more variously fascinating stream.