The Vandal state, indeed, was not in a condition to risk a quarrel with
Theodoric. Ever since the death of Hunneric it had been steadily on the
decline. In the reigns of Gunthamund (484-496) and Thrasamund himself
(496-523) it was continually losing ground to the insurgent Moors of
Atlas. Gunthamund, who was not a persecutor like his predecessor
Hunneric, had endeavoured to win the favour of the Catholics by allowing
them to recall their exiled bishops and open their churches. But these
boons did not check the falling away of his subjects, and during his
reign the Moors conquered from him the whole sea-coast from Tangiers to
the gates of Caesarea. [Sidenote: Vandal Persecutions in Africa.] His
brother Thrasamund tried the opposite policy, resumed the persecutions,
deported two hundred Catholic bishops to Sardinia, and renewed the
horrors of the days of Hunneric. Naturally, he was no more fortunate in
dealing with the native rebels than his brother had been. A quarrel with
Theodoric would have meant ruin, so he kept himself from all foreign
war. He died in 523 at a great age, killed, it is said, by the news of a
great defeat which his armies had suffered at the hands of the Moors.
His successor was his cousin Hilderic, the son of Hunneric and the Roman
princess Eudocia, the last scion of the house of Theodosius the Great.
Educated by a Catholic mother, Hilderic was himself the first orthodox
Vandal king, and ended the long African persecutions. But his reign was
not happier than those of his two cousins. His enthusiastic championship
of the Catholic cause brought him into collision with the bulk of his
Vandal subjects, and he was attacked by a rebellious party, headed by
Theodoric’s sister, the queen-dowager Amalafrida, who wished to proclaim
as king of Africa one of her late husband’s nephews. Hilderic had the
better of the fighting, defeated the rebels, and captured Amalafrida,
whom he consigned to a dungeon, to the great wrath of her brother, the
king of the Goths (523). As long as Theodoric lived he merely kept her
in close confinement, but the moment he heard of the old man’s death, in
526, he had the cruelty to slay the aged queen, a deed which alienated
for ever the Vandals and the Ostrogoths.
The captivity of his sister was not the only sorrow which clouded the
last few years of Theodoric’s long life. He was left in some trouble as
to the succession to his crown. He had married his only legitimate
child, Amalaswintha, to a Visigothic prince named Eutharic, of whose
prudence and valour much was expected. Theodoric intended him to reign
with his daughter as colleague and king-consort, but in 522 Eutharic
died, leaving as his heir a boy of only five years of age. Theodoric
could not but see that on his death the accession of a woman and a child
to the throne would be fraught with the gravest danger, more especially
as his nephew Theodahat, the nearest male heir of the Amal house, was
known to be an unscrupulous intriguer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account