The Deipnosophists; or, Banquet of the Learned of Athenæus, Vol. 2 (of 3)Athenaeus, of Naucratis
Philosophy
The Deipnosophists; or, Banquet of the Learned of Athenæus, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Athenaeus, of Naucratis
Civilization, Greco-Roman; Dinners and dining -- Greece; Greece -- Social life and customs; Homosexuality -- Greece
But in the dative they say ταὧνι, as Aristophanes does in the same
play. But it is quite impossible in the Attic or Ionic dialects that,
in nouns which have more than one syllable, the last syllable beginning
with a vowel should be aspirated; for it is quite inevitable that it
should be pronounced with a lene breathing, as νεὢς, λεὢς, Τυνδάρεὠς,
Μενέλεὠς, λειπόνεὠς, εὔνεὠς, Νείλεὠς, πρᾶὀς, ὑίὀς, Κεῖὀς, χῖὀς, δῖὀς,
χρεῖὀς, πλεῖὀς, λεῖὀς, λαιὄς, βαιὂς, φαιὂς, πηὂς, γόὀς, θοὂς, ῥόὀς,
ζωὄς. For the aspirate is fond of beginning a word, and is by nature
inclined to the lead, and is never included in the last part of a word.
And the name ταὧς is derived from the extension (τάσις) of the wings."
And Seleucus, in the fifth book of his treatise on Hellenisms, says:
"The peacock, ταὧς:—but the Attics, contrary to all rule, both aspirate
and circumflex the last syllable; but the aspirate is only attached
to the first vowel when it begins a word in the simple pronunciation
of the word, and there taking the lead, and running on more swiftly,
it has the first place in the word. Accordingly, the Athenians, in
consequence of this arrangement, observing the inherent character of
this breathing, do not put it _on_ vowels, as they do often accents and
breathings, but put it before them. And I think that the ancients used
to mark the aspirate by the character H, on which account the Romans
write the letter H at the beginning of all aspirated nouns, showing
its predominant nature; and if this be the proper character of the
aspirate, it is plain that it is contrary to all reason and analogy
that the word ταῶς has any breathing at all marked upon it by the Attic
writers."
58. And as at the banquet a great many more discussions arose about
each of the dishes that were served up;—But I, said Laurentius,
according to the example of our most excellent friend Ulpian, will
myself also say something to you (for we are feeding on discussions).
What do you think of the grouse? And when some one said,—He is a
species of bird; (but it is the custom of the sons of the grammarians
to say of anything that is mentioned to them in this way, It is a
species of plant, a species of bird, a species of stone;) Laurentius
said—And I, my good friend, am aware that the admirable Aristophanes,
in his Birds, mentions the grouse in the following lines—
With the porphyrion and the pelican,
And pelecinnus, and the phlexis too,
The grouse and peacock.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account