The description and use of the globes and the orrery: To which is prefix'd, by way of introduction, a brief account of the solar system — John Shaqi
The description and use of the globes and the orrery: To which is prefix'd, by way of introduction, a brief account of the solar systemHarris, Joseph
History
The description and use of the globes and the orrery: To which is prefix'd, by way of introduction, a brief account of the solar system
Harris, Joseph
Astronomical models; Globes
Since the meridians are all moveable, and not one that can be fixed
in the heavens, (as the equinoctial circle is fixed, from whence the
latitudes of all places are determined to be so much either North or
South) the longitudes of places cannot so well be fixed from any other
meridian, but every Geographer is at his liberty to make which he
pleases his first meridian, from whence to calculate the longitudes
of other places. Hence it is that geographers of different nations
reckon their longitudes from different meridians, commonly choosing the
meridian passing through the metropolis of their own country for their
first: Thus, the _English_ geographers generally make the meridian of
_London_ to be their first, the _French_ that of _Paris_, and the
_Dutch_ that of _Amsterdam_, &c. and mariners generally reckon the
longitude from the last known land they saw. This arbitrary way of
reckoning the longitude from different places, makes it necessary,
whenever we express the longitude of any place, that the place from
whence it is counted be also expressed.
From the preceding definitions arise the following corollaries:
1. _If a body should steer directly North, or
directly South, quite round the globe, he’ll
continually change his latitude; and pass through the
two Poles of the world, without deviating the least
from the meridian of the place he departed from; and
consequently on his return will not differ in his
account of time from the people residing in the said
place._
2. _If a body should steer round the globe either
due East, or due West, he’ll continually change his
longitude, but will go quite round without altering his
latitude; and if his course should be due East, he’ll
gain a day compleatly in his reckoning, or reckon one
day more than the inhabitants of the place from whence
he departed; or if his course had been West, he would
have lost one day, or reckon one less._
The reason of which is evident; for admitting our traveller steers due
East; so many miles in one day as to make his difference of longitude
equivalent to a quarter of an hour of time, it is evident that the
next day the Sun will rise to him a quarter of an hour sooner than to
the inhabitants of the place from whence he departed; and so daily,
in proportion to the rate he travels, which in going quite round,
will make up one natural day. In like manner, if he steers due West
after the same rate, he’ll lengthen each day a quarter of an hour,
and consequently the Sun will rise to him so much later every day; by
which means, in going quite round, he’ll lose one day compleat in his
reckoning. From whence it follows,
3. _If two bodies should set out from the same place,
one steering East, and the other West, and so continue
their courses quite round, until they arrive at the
place from whence they set out, they’ll differ two days
in their reckoning at the time of their return._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account