The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
_Soc._ And were we not saying just now that justice, temperance,
and the like, were each of them a part of virtue?
_Men._ Yes.
_Soc._ And so, Meno, this is the way in which you mock me.
_Men._ Why do you say that, Socrates?
_Soc._ Why, because I asked you to deliver virtue into my
hands whole and unbroken, and I gave you a pattern according
to which you were to frame your answer; and you have
forgotten already, and tell me that virtue is the power of
attaining good justly, or with justice; and justice you acknowledge
to be a part of virtue.
_Men._ Yes.
_Soc._ Then it follows from your own admissions, that virtue
is doing what you do with a part of virtue; for justice and
the like are said by you to be parts of virtue.
[Sidenote: But if we do not know the nature of virtue as a whole, how can
we know what a part of virtue is?]
_Men._ What of that?
_Soc._ What of that! Why, did not I ask you to tell me the
nature of virtue as a whole? And you are very far from
telling me this; but declare every action to be virtue which is
done with a part of virtue; as though you had told me and I
must already know the whole of virtue, and this too when
frittered away into little pieces. And, therefore, my dear
Meno, I fear that I must begin again and repeat the same
question: What is virtue? for otherwise, I can only say, that
every action done with a part of virtue is virtue; what else
is the meaning of saying that every action done with justice
is virtue? Ought I not to ask the question over again; for
can any one who does not know virtue know a part of
virtue?
_Men._ No; I do not say that he can.
_Soc._ Do you remember how, in the example of figure, we
rejected any answer given in terms which were as yet unexplained
or unadmitted?
_Men._ Yes, Socrates; and we were quite right in doing so.
_Soc._ But then, my friend, do not suppose that we can
explain to any one the nature of virtue as a whole through
some unexplained portion of virtue, or anything at all in that
fashion; we should only have to ask over again the old
question, What is virtue? Am I not right?
_Men._ I believe that you are.
_Soc._ Then begin again, and answer me, What, according to
you and your friend Gorgias, is the definition of virtue?
[Sidenote: _The torpedo’s shock._]
[Sidenote: Meno compares Socrates to a torpedo whose touch has taken away
his sense and speech.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account