The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
But you have just admitted that the good do their neighbours
good, and the evil do them evil. Now, is that a truth
which your superior wisdom has recognized thus early in life,
and am I, at my age, in such darkness and ignorance as not
to know that if a man with whom I have to live is corrupted
by me, I am very likely to be harmed by him; and yet I
corrupt him, and intentionally, too—so you say, although
neither I nor any other human being is ever likely to be
convinced by you. But either I do not corrupt them, or 26
I corrupt them unintentionally; and on either view of the
case you lie. If my offence is unintentional, the law has no
cognizance of unintentional offences: you ought to have
taken me privately, and warned and admonished me; for
if I had been better advised, I should have left off doing what
I only did unintentionally—no doubt I should; but you
would have nothing to say to me and refused to teach me.
And now you bring me up in this court, which is a place not
of instruction, but of punishment.
[Sidenote: _He neither knows nor cares about the interests of youth._]
It will be very clear to you, Athenians, as I was saying,
that Meletus has no care at all, great or small, about the
matter. But still I should like to know, Meletus, in what
I am affirmed to corrupt the young. I suppose you mean,
as I infer from your indictment, that I teach them not to
acknowledge the gods which the state acknowledges, but
some other new divinities or spiritual agencies in their
stead. These are the lessons by which I corrupt the youth,
as you say.
Yes, that I say emphatically.
[Sidenote: Socrates is declared by Meletus to be an atheist and to
corrupt the religion of the young.]
Then, by the gods, Meletus, of whom we are speaking, tell
me and the court, in somewhat plainer terms, what you mean!
for I do not as yet understand whether you affirm that I teach
other men to acknowledge some gods, and therefore that I do
believe in gods, and am not an entire atheist—this you do not
lay to my charge,—but only you say that they are not the
same gods which the city recognizes—the charge is that they
are different gods. Or, do you mean that I am an atheist
simply, and a teacher of atheism?
I mean the latter—that you are a complete atheist.
What an extraordinary statement! Why do you think so,
Meletus? Do you mean that I do not believe in the god-head
of the sun or moon, like other men?
I assure you, judges, that he does not: for he says that
the sun is stone, and the moon earth.
[Sidenote: Meletus has confounded Socrates with Anaxagoras; and he has
contradicted himself in the indictment.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account