The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-ParamitaUnknown
Religion
The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita
Unknown
Buddhism; Buddhism -- Sacred books
[3] “Gatha—hymns and chants, narratives containing moral
expositions in metrical language. A Chinese text says, ‘32
characters form one Gatha,’ which refers to a certain variety of
Gatha called Aryagiti, a metre consisting of 32
instants.”—_Handbook of Chinese Buddhism_. Eitel.
[4] “The _Dharmma_ (Law) is perfect, having nothing redundant, and
nothing wanting. But it requires attention, that the benefits it
offers may be received. Though the teacher may attain great
happiness, and enter Nirvana, it does not follow that the disciple
will necessarily possess the same privileges; he may be like one
who binds the crown upon the head of another. Therefore each one
for himself must exercise meditation, and observe the ordinances,
that he may attain wisdom.”—_Eastern Monachism_. Spence Hardy.
[5] “Faith is in the world the best property for a man; _Dhamma_
(the Law), well observed, conveys happiness; truth, indeed, is the
sweetest of things; and the life they call the best which is lived
with understanding.”—_Sutta-Nipata_. Fausböll.
[6] “What then, Subhuti? All the Buddhas, and all the perfect laws
of the Buddhas, have sprung from (the principles of) this one
Sutra; but, Subhuti, that which is spoken of as the Law of Buddha,
is after all not such a Law (or, is a Law of no
Buddha).”—_Kin-Kong-King_. Beal.
“Because, O Subhuti, the highest perfect knowledge of the holy and
enlightened Tathagatas is produced from it; the blessed Buddhas
are produced from it. And why? Because, O Subhuti, when the
Tathagata preached: ‘The qualities of Buddha, the qualities of
Buddha indeed!’ They were preached by him as no-qualities of
Buddha. Therefore they are called the qualities of Buddha.”—_The
Vagrakkhedika_. Max Müller.
An erudite Chinese commentator suggests that the words
_fei-fuh-fah_ are synonymous with _wu-wei-fah_—intuition, already
observed in the preceding section. A familiar passage from
_Lao-Tsz_, “Infinite truth is inexpressible,” is quoted by our
commentator as serving to illustrate the difficulty of giving
expression to an idea equivalent to the Law of Buddha.
[Chapter 9]
The Lord Buddha enquired of Subhuti, saying: “What think you? May a
Scrotapatti[1] (having entered the stream which bears on to Nirvana)
thus moralise within himself, ‘I have obtained the fruits[2]
commensurate with the merit of a Scrotapatti’?” Subhuti replied,
saying: “No! Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, Scrotapatti is
simply a descriptive term signifying ‘having entered the stream.’ A
disciple who avoids the seductive phenomena of form, sound, odour,
taste, touch, and Law,[3] is named a Scrotapatti.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account